Literature DB >> 17432067

Reference values for acoustic rhinometry in decongested school children and adults: the most sensitive measurement for change in nasal patency.

Sune P Straszek1, Vivi Schlünssen, T Sigsgaard, Ole F Pedersen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Only a limited reference material for acoustic rhinometry (AR) exists for school children most often calculated as the minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) in the non-decongested nose. We want to establish a set of reference values for MCA and nasal volumes for both adults and children and include values also for the decongested nose and determine the most sensitive measurement for change in nasal patency.
METHOD: Data from two studies were used; one comprising of 53 (20M, 33F) school children, age 9-11 years, and one comprising 146 (127M, 19F) healthy workers in the wood industry. Measurements by acoustic rhinometry were done before and after decongestion with two puffs of oxymethazoline nasal spray (1 mg/ml).
RESULTS: We found the decongested nasal volume (2-5 cm) to be 3.71 cm3 (3.58-3.84) in school children and 5.44 cm3 (5.21-5.67) in adults. We found the volume from 2-5 cm into the nasal cavity to be the most sensitive measure of change in nasal patency by decongestion, and MCA to be the least sensitive in both adults and children. DISCUSSION: A larger study population of children, covering a broader range of age, is needed to stratify for gender and height. Our data in adults are in accordance with previous findings.
CONCLUSION: We have provided a reference material for acoustic rhinometry in school children and adults. Future evaluation of change in nasal patency should contain information about nasal volume from 2-5 cm into the nasal cavity and not just MCA in adults and school children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17432067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostic methods of nasal respiratory function].

Authors:  G Mlynski; A Beule
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Subjective nasal fullness and objective congestion.

Authors:  James N Baraniuk
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2011-03

3.  Acoustic rhinometry in pediatric sleep apnea.

Authors:  Monica N Okun; Nicos Hadjiangelis; Daniel Green; Laura C Hedli; Kelvin C Lee; Ana C Krieger
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Nasal congestion after visual sexual stimulation with and without sildenafil (Viagra): a randomized placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Matteo Trimarchi; Andrea Salonia; Stefano Bondi; Francesco Montorsi; Mario Bussi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Physiology and pathophysiology of respiratory mucosa of the nose and the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  Achim G Beule
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

6.  Perception and Respiratory Responses of the Upper Airway Mechanism to Added Resistance With Aging.

Authors:  Siiri Murtolahti; Ulla K Crouse; Riitta Pahkala; Donald W Warren; Maija T Laine-Alava
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-11

7.  Role of Predatory Mites in Persistent Nonoccupational Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Paloma Poza Guedes; Inmaculada Sánchez Machín; Víctor Matheu; Víctor Iraola; Ruperto González Pérez
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.409

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.