| Literature DB >> 17428553 |
Els Keyaerts1, Leen Vijgen, Christophe Pannecouque, Els Van Damme, Willy Peumans, Herman Egberink, Jan Balzarini, Marc Van Ranst.
Abstract
We describe the antiviral activity of plant lectins with specificity for different glycan structures against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) in vitro. The SARS-CoV emerged in 2002 as an important cause of severe lower respiratory tract infection in humans, and FIPV infection causes a chronic and often fatal peritonitis in cats. A unique collection of 33 plant lectins with different specificities were evaluated. The plant lectins possessed marked antiviral properties against both coronaviruses with EC(50) values in the lower microgram/ml range (middle nanomolar range), being non-toxic (CC(50)) at 50-100 microg/ml. The strongest anti-coronavirus activity was found predominantly among the mannose-binding lectins. In addition, a number of galactose-, N-acetylgalactosamine-, glucose-, and N-acetylglucosamine-specific plant agglutinines exhibited anti-coronaviral activity. A significant correlation (with an r-value of 0.70) between the EC(50) values of the 10 mannose-specific plant lectins effective against the two coronaviruses was found. In contrast, little correlation was seen between the activity of other types of lectins. Two targets of possible antiviral intervention were identified in the replication cycle of SARS-CoV. The first target is located early in the replication cycle, most probably viral attachment, and the second target is located at the end of the infectious virus cycle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17428553 PMCID: PMC7114093 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.03.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antiviral Res ISSN: 0166-3542 Impact factor: 5.970
Plant lectins tested for their antiviral activity against SARS-CoV and FIPV
| Lectin | Plant species | Common name | Taxonomy | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Man-specific agglutinins | ||||
| HHA | Amaryllis | Monocot, Amaryllidaceae | ||
| GNA | Snowdrop | Monocot, Amaryllidaceae | ||
| NPA | daffodil | Monocot, Amaryllidaceae | ||
| LRA | Red spider lily | Monocot, Amaryllidaceae | ||
| APA | Leek | Monocot, Alliaceae | ||
| AUA | Ramsons | Monocot, Alliaceae | ||
| ASA | Garlic | Monocot, Alliaceae | ||
| ASA I | Garlic | Monocot, Alliaceae | ||
| Col O | Taro | Monocot, Araceae | ||
| CA | Cymbidium orchid | Monocot, Orchidaceae | ||
| LOA | Twayblade | Monocot, Orchidaceae | ||
| EHA | Broad-leaved helleborine | Monocot, Orchidaceae | ||
| TL M I | Tulip | Monocot, Liliaceae | ||
| Morniga M II | Black mulberry tree | Dicotyl, Moraceae | ||
| GlcNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||
| PallGlcNac | Common reed | Monocot, Gramineae | ||
| Nictaba | Tabacco plant | Dicot, Solanaceae | ||
| (GlcNAc) | ||||
| UDA | Stinging nettle | Dicot, Urticaceae c | ||
| Heveine | Rubber tree | Dicot, Euphorbiaceae | ||
| GalNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||
| PMRIP t | Solomon's seal | Monocot, Liliaceae | ||
| BDA | White bryony | Dicot, Curcurbitaceae | ||
| Glechoma | Ground ivy | Dicot, Lamiaceae | ||
| Gal-specific agglutinins | ||||
| Morniga G II | Black mulberry tree | Dicot, Moraceae | ||
| Jacalin | Jackfruit | Dicot, Moraceae | ||
| Neu5Acα(2.6)Gal/GalNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||
| SNA I | Elderberry | Dicot, Sambucaceae | ||
| Man/Glc-specific agglutinins | ||||
| Cladistris | Yellow wood | Dicot, Fabaceae | ||
| Gal/GalNAc specific agglutinins | ||||
| PMRIP m | Solomon's Seal | Monocot, Liliaceae | ||
| ML II | Mistletoe | Dicotyledoneae, Viscaceae | ||
| GalNAc (>Gal) specific agglutinins | ||||
| ML III | Mistletoe | Dicotyl, Viscaceae | ||
| GalNAcα(1,3)Gal > GalNAc > Gal-specific agglutinins | ||||
| IRA | Iris | Monocot, Iridaceae | ||
| IRA b | Iris | Monocot, Iridaceae | ||
| IRA r | Iris | Monocot, Iridaceae | ||
| Man/GalNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||
| TL C II | Tulip | Monocot, Liliaceae | ||
Monocot: Monocotyledoneae, dicot: Dicotyledoneae, Man: mannose, GlcNac: N-acetyl glucosamine, GalNAc: N-acetyl galactosamine, Gal: galactose, Neu5Ac: N-acetylneuraminic acid.
Antiviral activity of plant lectins against SARS-CoV and FIPV replication in Vero and Crandell Feline kidney cells
| Lectin | SARS-CoV | FIPV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC50 (μg/ml) | CC50 (μg/ml) | SI | EC50 (μg/ml) | CC50 (μg/ml) | SI | |
| Mannose-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| HHA | 3.2 ± 2.8 | >100 | >31.3 | 2.6 ± 1.0 | >100 | >38.5 |
| GNA | 6.2 ± 0.6 | >100 | >16.1 | 3.9 ± ±2.2 | >100 | >25.6 |
| NPA | 5.7 ± 4.4 | >100 | >17.5 | 24 ± 5 | >100 | >4.2 |
| LRA | 48 | >100 | >2.1 | ind | >20 | na |
| APA | 0.45 ± 0.08 | >100 | >222.2 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 17 ± 4 | 8.5 |
| AUA | 18 ± 4 | >100 | >5.5 | 16 ± 5 | >100 | >6.2 |
| ASA | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| ASA I | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| Col O | >60 | 63 ± 3 | na | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 12 ± 0 | 4.8 |
| CA | 4.9 ± 0.8 | >100 | >20 | 4.5 + 2.6 | >50 | >22 |
| LOA | 2.2 ± 1.3 | >100 | >45.5 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | >100 | >142.8 |
| EHA | 1.8 ± 0.3 | >100 | >55.5 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | >100 | >62.5 |
| TL M I | 22 ± 6 | >50 | >2.3 | ind | >50 | na |
| Morniga M II | 1.6 ± 0.5 | >100 | >62.5 | 2.9 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 1 | 3.8 |
| GlcNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| PallGlcNac | >100 | >100 | na | >20 | 57 ± 1 | na |
| Nictaba | 1.7 ± 0.3 | >100 | >58.8 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | >100 | >23.2 |
| (GlcNAc) | ||||||
| UDA | 1.3 ± 0.1 | >100 | >76.9 | 3.6 ± 2.3 | 15 ± 14 | 4.16 |
| Heveine | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| GalNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| PMRIP t | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| BDA | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| Glechoma | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| Gal-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| Morniga G II | 50 ± 13 | >100 | >2 | 11 ± 2 | >100 | >9.1 |
| Jacalin | >100 | >100 | na | 25 ± 2 | >100 | >4 |
| Neu5Acα(2.6)Gal/GalNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| SNA I | >100 | >100 | na | >100 | >100 | na |
| Man/Glc-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| Cladistris | 7.4 ± 0.2 | >100 | >13.5 | 17 ± 6 | >100 | >5.9 |
| Gal/GalNAc specific agglutinins | ||||||
| PMRIP m | 18 ± 13 | >100 | >5.5 | 60 ± 5 | >100 | >1.7 |
| ML II | 0.015 ± 0.003 | < 0.16 | na | >0.008 | 0.0022 ± 0.005 | na |
| GalNAc (>Gal) specific agglutinins | ||||||
| ML III | 28 ± 11 | >100 | >12.6 | >100 | >100 | na |
| GalNAcα(1,3)Gal > GalNAc > Gal-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| IRA | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 50 | 22.7 | >20 | >20 | na |
| IRA b | 4.4 ± 3.1 | 36 | 8.2 | >0.16 | 0.55 ± 0.23 | na |
| IRA r | 3.4 ± 2.0 | 55 | 16.2 | >0.16 | 0.49 ± 0.28 | na |
| Man/GalNAc-specific agglutinins | ||||||
| TL C II | 38 ± 0 | >50 | >1.3 | 21 ± 1 | >50 | >2.4 |
Man: mannose, GlcNac: N-acetyl glucosamine, GalNAc: N-acetyl galactosamine, Gal: galactose, Neu5Ac: N-acetylneuraminic acid, na: no activity, ind: indeterminable.
Fig. 1Intracellular SARS-CoV replication in Vero E6 cells after treatment with HHA concentrations at different time points post-infection (■). Vero E6 cells were infected with 1000 CCID50 SARS-CoV FFM-1 at different time-points post-infection HHA (32 μg/ml) is added to the infected cells. The virus control represents infected cells incubated with medium (□). Eight hours after infection, cell supernatants were collected and viral RNA was extracted and quantified by qRT-PCR as described in Section 2. Data are mean values ± S.E.M. of at least three replicates.
Fig. 2Extracellular SARS-CoV replication in Vero E6 cells after treatment with HHA at different time points post-infection (■). Vero E6 cells were infected with 1000 CCID50 SARS-CoV FFM-1 at different time-points post-infection HHA (32 μg/ml) is added to the infected cells. The virus control represents infected cells incubated with medium (□). Eight hours after infection, cell supernatants were collected and viral RNA was extracted and quantified by qRT-PCR as Section 2. Data are mean values ± S.E.M. of at least three replicates. The dotted line represents the residual background of viral load, that was detected after washing the cells.
Fig. 3The inhibitory effects of HHA on virus adsorption to Vero E6 cells are presented as percent protection. Two experiments were performed in parallel. In the first setting (white bars), the compound was present only during virus attachment. In the second setting (black bars), the compound was present during virus attachment and penetration. Data are mean values ± S.E.M. of four replicates.
Fig. 4Calculation of the correlation coefficient between the EC50 values of the plant lectins against SARS-CoV on the one hand, and the EC50 values of the compounds against FIPV on the other hand, resulted in an r-value of 0.38. When only the active mannose-specific lectins were taken into account, an r-value of 0.70 was found.