Literature DB >> 17428113

Efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and cyclosporine (ciclosporin) as adjuvant drugs in pemphigus vulgaris.

Malgorzata Olszewska1, Zofia Kolacinska-Strasz, Jadwiga Sulej, Hanna Labecka, Jaroslaw Cwikla, Urszula Natorska, Maria Blaszczyk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris is a potentially life-threatening, autoimmune bullous disease of the skin and mucous membranes. Most commonly, the disease is treated with prednisone in combination with an immunosuppressant agent, frequently referred to as adjuvant drug. However, there is no consensus regarding the first-choice adjuvant drug for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris or the recommended dosage.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prednisone as monotherapy and in combination with the three most popular adjuvant agents - azathioprine, cyclosporine (ciclosporin), and cyclophosphamide - in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a follow-up of 7-21 years. The study was conducted in an academic hospital with an outpatient division for patients with bullous diseases. A total of 101 patients with moderate-to-severe mucocutaneous pemphigus vulgaris were included in the study. For assessment of disease severity a 'pemphigus score,' based on the percentage of involved skin or oral mucous membranes, was developed. At treatment initiation the average pemphigus score was comparable in all treated groups of patients. Four treatment regimens were evaluated: oral prednisone at an initial dose of 100mg (1.1-1.5 mg/kg) per day as monotherapy, and prednisone combined with adjuvant drugs, i.e. oral azathioprine at a dose of 100mg (1.1-1.5 mg/kg) per day; cyclosporine (ciclosporin) at a dose of 2.5-3 mg/kg/day; or cyclophosphamide at a dose of 100mg (1.1-1.5 mg/kg) per day. The main outcome measures were average time to clinical remission, average time to immunologic remission (non-detectable circulating pemphigus vulgaris antibodies), proportion of patients who remained free of clinical relapse within 5 years after discontinuation of therapy, time from treatment discontinuation until first relapse, and incidence of adverse effects.
RESULTS: The average (+/- SD) time to clinical remission was 7.2 +/- 13.1 months in patients who received prednisone monotherapy, 6.8 +/- 10.5 months in patients receiving additional azathioprine, 8.1 +/- 11.8 months in the cyclosporine group, and 4.9 +/- 6.9 months (which was significantly shorter than all other treatment groups, p < 0.05) in patients receiving cyclophosphamide. The average (+/- SD) times to immunologic remission were 33 +/- 27 months, 28 +/- 24 months, 30 +/- 21 months, and 23 +/- 17 months for prednisone monotherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, respectively. The proportions of patients who remained free of clinical relapse within 5 years after discontinuation of therapy were 55%, 50%, 43%, and 69% for prednisone monotherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, respectively. In patents who experienced relapse, the average (+/- SD) time from treatment discontinuation to clinical relapse was 10.50 +/- 6.86 months in patients receiving prednisone monotherapy, 16.40 +/- 17.36 months in the azathioprine group, 12.44 +/- 6.48 months in the cyclosporine group, and 21.16 +/- 20.13 months in the cyclophosphamide group. The safety profiles of all treatment regimens were comparable.
CONCLUSION: Oral prednisone with cyclophosphamide is the most effective treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. All therapy regimens had a similar safety profile. In our opinion, cyclophosphamide at a dose of 1.1-1.5 mg/kg/day should be the adjuvant drug of choice in the treatment of moderate-to-severe pemphigus vulgaris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17428113     DOI: 10.2165/00128071-200708020-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol        ISSN: 1175-0561            Impact factor:   7.403


  9 in total

Review 1.  Seeking approval: present and future therapies for pemphigus vulgaris.

Authors:  Xuming Mao; Aimee S Payne
Journal:  Curr Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2008-05

2.  Response of ocular pemphigus vulgaris to therapy. Case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Malgorzata Olszewska; Marta Komor; Magdalena Mazur; Tomasz Rogozinski
Journal:  J Dermatol Case Rep       Date:  2008-03-29

3.  Respiratory function in patients with pemphigus vulgaris - a small clinical study.

Authors:  Zoi Apalla; Diamantis Chloros; Paraskevi Argyropoulou; Dimitrios Georgopoulos; Dimitrios Patakas; Dimitrios Spanos; George Chaidemenos
Journal:  J Dermatol Case Rep       Date:  2011-03-26

Review 4.  Pemphigus.

Authors:  Michael Kasperkiewicz; Christoph T Ellebrecht; Hayato Takahashi; Jun Yamagami; Detlef Zillikens; Aimee S Payne; Masayuki Amagai
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 52.329

5.  The value of trichoscopy in the differential diagnosis of scalp lesions in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

Authors:  Marta Sar-Pomian; Marta Kurzeja; Lidia Rudnicka; Malgorzata Olszewska
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 6.  Side effects of steroid-sparing agents in patients with bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus: A systematic review.

Authors:  Faith A P Zeng; Anna Wilson; Tabrez Sheriff; Dedee F Murrell
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2022-08-07

7.  Efficacy of Repeated Courses of Rituximab as Treatment for Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Authors:  Sharon Baum; Tal Raviv; Sarit Gilboa; Felix Pavlotsky; Aviv Barzilai
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 8.  Management of pemphigus vulgaris: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Stamatis Gregoriou; Ourania Efthymiou; Christina Stefanaki; Dimitris Rigopoulos
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2015-10-21

9.  A Comparative Effectiveness Research of Azathioprine and Cyclophosphamide on the Clinical and Serological Response in Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Authors:  Kabir Sardana; Pooja Agarwal; Shivani Bansal; Beena Uppal; Vijay K Garg
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.