Literature DB >> 17427132

Short-term foraging costs and long-term fueling rates in central-place foraging swans revealed by giving-up exploitation times.

J A van Gils1, W Tijsen.   

Abstract

Foragers tend to exploit patches to a lesser extent farther away from their central place. This has been interpreted as a response to increased risk of predation or increased metabolic costs of prey delivery. Here we show that migratory Bewick's swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii), though not incurring greater predation risks farther out or delivering food to a central place, also feed for shorter periods at patches farther away from their roost. Predictions from an energy budget model suggest that increasing metabolic travel costs per se are responsible. Establishing the relation between intake rate and exploitation time enabled us to express giving-up exploitation times as quitting harvest rates (QHRs). This revealed that net QHRs were not different from observed long-term net intake rates, a sign that the birds were maximizing their long-term net intake rate. This study is unique because giving-up decisions were measured at the individual level, metabolic and predation costs were assessed simultaneously, the relation with harvest rate was made explicit, and finally, short-term giving-up decisions were related to long-term net intake rates. We discuss and conceptualize the implications of metabolic traveling costs for carrying-capacity predictions by bridging the gap between optimal-foraging theory and optimal-migration theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17427132     DOI: 10.1086/513114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  5 in total

1.  Construction of energy landscapes can clarify the movement and distribution of foraging animals.

Authors:  Rory P Wilson; Flavio Quintana; Victoria J Hobson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory.

Authors:  Ola Olsson; Arvid Bolin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Determination of foraging thresholds and effects of application on energetic carrying capacity for waterfowl.

Authors:  Heath M Hagy; Richard M Kaminski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Terrestrial locomotion energy costs vary considerably between species: no evidence that this is explained by rate of leg force production or ecology.

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey; Craig R White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessing trade-offs in avian behaviour using remotely collected data from a webcam.

Authors:  Kevin A Wood; Rebecca Lacey; Paul E Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.