Literature DB >> 17426277

Safety and immunogenicity of a baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin influenza vaccine: a randomized controlled trial.

John J Treanor1, Gilbert M Schiff, Frederick G Hayden, Rebecca C Brady, C Mhorag Hay, Anthony L Meyer, Jeanne Holden-Wiltse, Hua Liang, Adam Gilbert, Manon Cox.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A high priority in vaccine research is the development of influenza vaccines that do not use embryonated eggs as the substrate for vaccine production.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the dose-related safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of an experimental trivalent influenza virus hemagglutinin (rHA0) vaccine produced in insect cells using recombinant baculoviruses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial at 3 US academic medical centers during the 2004-2005 influenza season among 460 healthy adults without high-risk indications for influenza vaccine.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of saline placebo (n = 154); 75 microg of an rHA0 vaccine containing 15 microg of hemagglutinin from influenza A/New Caledonia/20/99(H1N1) and influenza B/Jiangsu/10/03 virus and 45 microg of hemagglutinin from influenza A/Wyoming/3/03(H3N2) virus (n = 153); or 135 microg of rHA0 containing 45 microg of hemagglutinin each from all 3 components (n = 153). Serum samples were taken before and 30 days following immunization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary safety end points were the rates and severity of solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Primary immunogenicity end points were the rates of 4-fold or greater increases in serum hemagglutinin inhibition antibody to each of the 3 vaccine strains before and 28 days after inoculation. The prespecified primary efficacy end point was culture-documented influenza illness, defined as development of influenza-like illness associated with influenza virus on a nasopharyngeal swab.
RESULTS: Rates of local and systemic adverse effects were low, and the rates of systemic adverse effects were not different in either vaccine group than in the placebo group. Hemagglutinin inhibition antibody responses to the H1 component were seen in 3% of placebo, 51% of 75-microg vaccine, and 67% of 135-microg vaccine recipients, while responses to B were seen in 4% of placebo, 65% of 75-microg vaccine, and 92% of 135-microg vaccine recipients. Responses to the H3 component occurred in 11% of placebo, 81% of 75-microg vaccine, and 77% of 135-microg vaccine recipients. Influenza infections in the study population were due to influenza B and A(H3N2), and influenza A infections were A/California/7/2004-like viruses, an antigenically drifted strain. Seven cases of culture-confirmed CDC-defined influenza-like illness occurred in 153 placebo recipients (4.6%) compared with 2 cases (1.3%) in 150 recipients of 75 microg of vaccine, and 0 cases in recipients of 135 microg of vaccine.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a trivalent rHA0 vaccine was safe and immunogenic in a healthy adult population. Preliminary evidence of protection against a drifted influenza A(H3N2) virus was obtained, but the sample size was small. Inclusion of a neuraminidase component did not appear to be required for protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00328107.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426277     DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.14.1577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  56 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from successful human vaccines: Delineating key epitopes by dissecting the capsid proteins.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Lu Xin; Shaowei Li; Mujin Fang; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Qinjian Zhao
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Subcutaneous immunization with baculovirus surface-displayed hemagglutinin of pandemic H1N1 Influenza A virus induces protective immunity in mice.

Authors:  Mookkan Prabakaran; Tao Meng; Fang He; Tan Yunrui; Jia Qiang; Raymond Tzer Pin Lin; Jimmy Kwang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-07-13

3.  Genetic and proteomic analysis of the MHC class I repertoire from four ovine haplotypes.

Authors:  Keith T Ballingall; Despoina Miltiadou; Zhong-Wei Chai; Kevin McLean; Mara Rocchi; Raja Yaga; Declan J McKeever
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 4.  Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (flublok(®)): a review of its use in the prevention of seasonal influenza in adults.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Nanodisc-incorporated hemagglutinin provides protective immunity against influenza virus infection.

Authors:  Palash Bhattacharya; Steve Grimme; Balaji Ganesh; Anupama Gopisetty; Jian Rong Sheng; Osvaldo Martinez; Shankar Jayarama; Michael Artinger; Matthew Meriggioli; Bellur S Prabhakar
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Pandemic influenza H1N1 2009, innate immunity, and the impact of immunosenescence on influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Samit R Joshi; Albert C Shaw; Vincent J Quagliarello
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2009-12

7.  Immune response to influenza vaccine in children with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Denise L Jacobson; Lori A Ashworth; Richard J Grand; Anthony L Meyer; Monica M McNeal; Matt C Gregas; Sandra K Burchett; Athos Bousvaros
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  A recombinant West Nile virus envelope protein vaccine candidate produced in Spodoptera frugiperda expresSF+ cells.

Authors:  Nathalie Bonafé; Joseph A Rininger; Richard G Chubet; Harald G Foellmer; Stacey Fader; John F Anderson; Sandra L Bushmich; Karen Anthony; Michel Ledizet; Erol Fikrig; Raymond A Koski; Paul Kaplan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Technical transformation of biodefense vaccines.

Authors:  Shan Lu; Shixia Wang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  A replication-incompetent Rift Valley fever vaccine: chimeric virus-like particles protect mice and rats against lethal challenge.

Authors:  Robert B Mandell; Ramesh Koukuntla; Laura J K Mogler; Andrea K Carzoli; Alexander N Freiberg; Michael R Holbrook; Brian K Martin; William R Staplin; Nicholas N Vahanian; Charles J Link; Ramon Flick
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.