Literature DB >> 17426006

Individuals in foraging groups may use vocal cues when assessing their need for anti-predator vigilance.

Andrew N Radford1, Amanda R Ridley.   

Abstract

Many studies of social species have reported variation in the anti-predator vigilance behaviour of foraging individuals depending on the presence and relative position of other group members. However, little attention has focused on how foragers assess these variables. It is commonly assumed that they do so visually, but many social species produce frequent calls while foraging, and these 'close' calls might provide valuable spatial information. Here, we show that foraging pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) are less vigilant when in larger groups, in the centre of a group and in closer proximity to another group member. We then show that foragers are less vigilant during playbacks of close calling by more individuals and individuals on either side of them when compared with calls of fewer individuals and calls on one side of them. These results suggest that foragers can use vocal cues to gain information on group size and their spatial position within a group. Future studies of anti-predator vigilance should consider the relative importance of both visual and vocal monitoring of group members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426006      PMCID: PMC2464705          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms.

Authors:  Guy Beauchamp
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Visual perception and social foraging in birds.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jonathan T Erichsen; Alex Kacelnik
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Individual voice recognition in birds.

Authors:  A Dhondt; M M Lambrechts
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  On the advantages of flocking.

Authors:  H R Pulliam
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Recruitment calling: a novel form of extended parental care in an altricial species.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Negotiating a stable solution for vigilance behaviour.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Tim W Fawcett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bargaining babblers: vocal negotiation of cooperative behaviour in a social bird.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R A Smith; A M Thompson; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R Rose; H M Wade; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Linda I Hollén; Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Amanda R Ridley; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Communication about social status.

Authors:  Russell D Fernald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Calling by concluding sentinels: coordinating cooperation or revealing risk?

Authors:  Linda I Hollén; Matthew B V Bell; Alexis Russell; Fraser Niven; Amanda R Ridley; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Coordination and synchronisation of anti-predation vigilance in two crane species.

Authors:  Chen Ge; Guy Beauchamp; Zhongqiu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validation of trophic and anthropic underwater noise as settlement trigger in blue mussels.

Authors:  Aurélie Jolivet; Rejean Tremblay; Fréderic Olivier; Cédric Gervaise; Rémi Sonier; Bertrand Genard; Laurent Chauvaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Group association and vocal behaviour during foraging trips in Gentoo penguins.

Authors:  Noori Choi; Jeong-Hoon Kim; Nobuo Kokubun; Seongseop Park; Hosung Chung; Won Young Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.