Literature DB >> 1742583

Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers.

M A Laskey1, M E Flaxman, R W Barber, S Trafford, M P Hayball, K D Lyttle, A J Crisp, J E Compston.   

Abstract

The measured absolute bone mineral density values of spine and femur and their precision were compared on two dual energy X-ray absorptiometers, the Lunar DPX and the Hologic QDR-1000. There were systematic differences between the two systems, the Lunar DPX always giving a higher bone density value. The ratio of the mean Lunar DPX/Hologic QDR-1000 bone density measurements obtained in vivo was 1.13 g/cm2 for spine (L2-L4) and 1.20-1.43 g/cm2 for femur measurements. For both systems, short- and long-term precision (coefficient of variation) was below 0.5% for spine in vitro measurements and below 1.5% for neck of femur in vitro measurements. Precision of in vivo measurements was less good, especially for femur measurements. The coefficient of variation of spine measurements was dependent on bone density and deteriorated with decreased bone mineral density and increased body thickness.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1742583     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  Endogenous sex hormones and bone mineral density among community-based postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Murphy; K T Khaw; M J Sneyd; J E Compston
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Should all elderly women receive bisphosphonates to prevent osteoporotic fractures?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-01

3.  Bone mineral density testing: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; G Michael Allan; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Comparison of spine and femur reference data in native Chinese women from different regions of China.

Authors:  Xian-Ping Wu; Er-Yuan Liao; Ru-Chun Dai; Peng-Fei Shan; Tuan-Yu Fang; Xiang-Hang Luo; Yin-Zhen Pi; Yebin Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.

Authors:  Nicola J Crabtree; N J Shaw; C M Boivin; B Oldroyd; J G Truscott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The effects of standardization and reference values on patient classification for spine and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Simmons; D E Simpson; M J O'Doherty; S Barrington; A J Coakley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Low bone mineral density at femoral neck is a predictor of increased mortality in elderly Japanese women.

Authors:  T Suzuki; H Yoshida
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Dongil Choi; Deog-Yoon Kim; Chung Soo Han; Seonwoo Kim; Hae Sook Bok; Wooseong Huh; Jae-Wook Ko; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Cross-calibration of DXA scanners for spine measurements.

Authors:  P Tothill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  An association between respiratory function and hip bone mineral density in older men: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Lekamwasam; D P Trivedi; K T Khaw
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.