Literature DB >> 1742578

Quantitative computed tomography: comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms.

S Suzuki1, T Yamamuro, H Okumura, I Yamamoto.   

Abstract

To assess computed tomography (CT) scanners in vertebral quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurement, five cadaveric vertebrae fixed in a water phantom were measured using 16 CT scanners of 10 different models using two types (CaCO3 and K2HPO4) of reference phantom. Although the same reference phantoms were used, the QCT values varied markedly depending on the CT scanner employed. The differences in QCT values were greater in the equivalent amount of CaCO3 than in that of K2HPO4. The largest difference between CT scanners was 40 mg/cm3 in the equivalent amount of CaCO3 and 28 mg/cm3 in that of K2HPO4. These differences were reflected among CT scanners by different slopes and intercepts of the reference lines of CaCO3, K2HPO4 and ash density depending on the CT scanner used. However, good correlations (r greater than 0.97) were observed for the QCT values obtained by various CT scanners. These results show that QCT values on one machine can be compared more closely with those of another machine if conversion formulae, determined by using materials equivalent to human vertebral bone, are employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1742578     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Jorn Op Den Buijs; Sean McEligot; Yifei Dai; Rachel C Entwistle; Christina Salas; L Joseph Melton; Kevin E Bennet; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  J Pearson; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; A M Laval-Jeantet; P Rüegsegger; D Felsenberg; J Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density.

Authors:  Jorn Op Den Buijs; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Novel anthropomorphic hip phantom corrects systemic interscanner differences in proximal femoral vBMD.

Authors:  S Bonaretti; R D Carpenter; I Saeed; A J Burghardt; L Yu; M Bruesewitz; S Khosla; T Lang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Cartilage thickness: factors influencing multidetector CT measurements in a phantom study.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Jacob M Reeves; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-12-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.