Literature DB >> 1742308

Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate.

C Asher-McDade1, C Roberts, W C Shaw, C Gallager.   

Abstract

Comparison of the outcome of treatment of patients with clefts of the lip and palate can yield valuable pointers for discriminating between beneficial and harmful procedures. The development of a standardized rating scheme to assess the facial appearance of these patients is described. The rating scheme can be used in conjunction with conventional cephalometric analysis and dental arch evaluation. A method is described in which the nasolabial area is masked, thus reducing the influence of the surrounding facial features since it is shown that judges are influenced by general facial attractiveness. An ordinal scale has been evaluated in which four features of the nose and lip are assessed separately and in total by a panel of judges. The nasolabial profile, the nasal symmetry, the nasal form, and vermilion border were assessed using a 5-point scale. Acceptable pooled levels of reliability and reproducibility were obtained. This standardized rating system may be used to differentiate treatment outcome in patients from different treatment centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1742308     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0385_doamfr_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  40 in total

1.  Objective three-dimensional assessment of lip form in patients with repaired cleft lip.

Authors:  Chihiro Tanikawa; Kenji Takada; John van Aalst; Carroll Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-03-12

2.  Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Carolin Unger; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Keskanya Subbalekha
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22

3.  Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs.

Authors:  Adam Stebel; Dries Desmedt; Ewald Bronkhorst; Mette A Kuijpers; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Aesthetic evaluation of the nasolabial region in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate comparing expert versus nonexperience health professionals.

Authors:  Tatiana Saito Paiva; Marcia Andre; Wellingson Silva Paiva; Beatriz Silva Camara Mattos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The effects of lip revision surgery on nasolabial esthetics in patients with cleft lip.

Authors:  A M Mercado; C Phillips; K W L Vig; C-A Trotman
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Panel perception of facial appearance of cleft patients generated by use of a morphing technique.

Authors:  Vedat Yildirim; Alexander Hemprich; Martin Gründl; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-19

7.  Faces in 4 dimensions: Why do we care, and why the fourth dimension?

Authors:  Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Surgical outcomes auditing systems in humanitarian organizations.

Authors:  Luis Bermudez; Victoria Carter; William Magee; Randy Sherman; Ruben Ayala
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Assessment of deformities of the lip and nose in cleft lip alveolus and palate patients by a rating scale.

Authors:  B R Rajanikanth; Krishna Shama Rao; S M Sharma; B Rajendra Prasad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-10-18

10.  Psychosocial acceptance of cleft patients: has something changed?

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Karsten Winter; Dirk Halama; Christian Wirtz; Vedat Yildirim; Nattapong Sirintawat; Sirintawat Nattapong
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.