Literature DB >> 17420424

Physician consideration of patients' out-of-pocket costs in making common clinical decisions.

Hoangmai H Pham1, G Caleb Alexander, Ann S O'Malley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients face growing cost-sharing through higher deductibles and other out-of-pocket (OP) expenses, with uncertain effects on clinical decision making.
METHODS: We analyzed data on 6628 respondents to the nationally representative 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey to examine how frequently physicians report considering their insured patients' OP expenses when prescribing drugs, selecting diagnostic tests, and choosing inpatient vs outpatient care settings. Responses were dichotomized as always/usually vs sometimes/rarely/never. In separate multivariate logistic regressions, we examined associations between physicians' reported frequency of considering OP costs for each type of decision and characteristics of individual physicians and their practices.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of physicians reported routinely considering OP costs when prescribing drugs, while 51.2% reported doing so when selecting care settings, and 40.2% when selecting diagnostic tests. In adjusted analyses, primary care physicians were more likely than medical specialists to consider patients' OP costs in choosing prescription drugs (85.3% vs 74.5%) (P<.001), care settings (53.9% vs 43.1%) (P<.001), and diagnostic tests (46.3% vs 29.9%) (P<.001). Physicians working in large groups or health maintenance organizations were more likely to consider OP costs in prescribing generic drugs (P<.001 for comparisons with solo and 2-person practices), but those in solo or 2-person practices were more likely to do so in choosing tests and care settings (P<.05 for all comparisons with other practice types). Physicians providing at least 10 hours of charity care a month were more likely than those not providing any to consider OP costs in both diagnostic testing (40.7% vs 35.8%) (P<.001) and care setting decisions (51.4% vs 47.6%) (P<.005).
CONCLUSION: Cost-sharing arrangements targeting patients are likely to have limited effects in safely reducing health care spending because physicians do not routinely consider patients' OP costs when making decisions regarding more expensive medical services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17420424     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.7.663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  18 in total

1.  Economic content in medical journal advertisements for medical devices and prescription drugs.

Authors:  D Clay Ackerly; Seth W Glickman; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic prescribing behavior.

Authors:  Shane P Stenner; Qingxia Chen; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Out-of-pocket payments in arthritis: spur to prudent purchasing or red herring?

Authors:  Edward Yelin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-08

Review 4.  Factors Contributing to Variations in Physicians' Use of Evidence at The Point of Care: A Conceptual Model.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Eugene C Rich; Timothy K Lake
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Coping strategies used by patients infected with hepatitis C virus who are facing medication costs.

Authors:  Chiranjeev Sanyal; Ethel Langille Ingram; Ingrid S Sketris; Kevork M Peltekian; Susan Kirkland
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-03

6.  What Strategies Do Physicians and Patients Discuss to Reduce Out-of-Pocket Costs? Analysis of Cost-Saving Strategies in 1,755 Outpatient Clinic Visits.

Authors:  Wynn G Hunter; Cecilia Z Zhang; Ashley Hesson; J Kelly Davis; Christine Kirby; Lillie D Williamson; Jamison A Barnett; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  The impact of cost displays on primary care physician laboratory test ordering.

Authors:  Daniel M Horn; Kate E Koplan; Margaret D Senese; E John Orav; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Cholesterol treatment with statins: who is left out and who makes it to goal?

Authors:  Peter Franks; Daniel Tancredi; Paul Winters; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The impact of consumer-directed health plans and patient socioeconomic status on physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Giridhar Mallya; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  ePrescribing: Reducing Costs through In-Class Therapeutic Interchange.

Authors:  Shane P Stenner; Rohini Chakravarthy; Kevin B Johnson; William L Miller; Julie Olson; Marleen Wickizer; Nate N Johnson; Rick Ohmer; David R Uskavitch; Gordon R Bernard; Erin B Neal; Christoph U Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.