Literature DB >> 17418336

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament by using a quadriceps tendon autograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Chin-Hsien Wu1, Alvin Chao-Yu Chen, Li-Jen Yuan, Chung-Hsun Chang, Yi-Sheng Chan, Kuo-Yao Hsu, Ching-Jen Wang, Wen-Jer Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively assessed 22 consecutively treated patients to determine the effectiveness and safety of arthroscopically assisted posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction by using a quadriceps tendon autograft.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients with isolated PCL injury who underwent PCL reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon autograft were enrolled in the prospective study. The average follow-up period was 66 months (range, 60-76). Follow-up included Lysholm knee scores, Tegner activity scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, thigh muscle assessment, and radiographic assessment.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative Lysholm score for 22 knees was 67 (range, 50 to 75), and the mean postoperative Lysholm score was 89 (range, 75 to 98). Nineteen of 22 patients (86%) displayed good or excellent results in the final assessment. The mean preoperative Tegner score for 22 knees was 3 (range, 2 to 5), whereas the mean postoperative Tegner score was 6 (range, 3 to 9). There were statistically significant improvements in Lysholm score (P = .009), Tegner score (P = .039), postoperative KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) scores (P = .006), final IKDC rating (P = .035), and thigh atrophy and muscle strength (P < .05) when compared with preoperative data. Regarding IKDC final rating, 82% of the patients (18 of 22) were assessed as normal or nearly normal (grade A or B).
CONCLUSIONS: After follow-up for more than 60 months, the analytical results showed patients achieved satisfactory function after PCL reconstruction by using a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. This study suggests that a quadriceps tendon autograft is sufficiently large and strong and can achieve good ligament function after reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17418336     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  [Outcome 4 years after isolated single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  M Lahner; T Vogel; M S Schulz; M J Strobel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Odd Arve Lien; Emilie Jul-Larsen Aas; Steinar Johansen; Tom Clement Ludvigsen; Wender Figved; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Posterior tibial translation resulting from the posterior drawer manoeuver in cadaveric knee specimens: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcin Kowalczuk; Marie-Claude Leblanc; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Operative management of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries improves stability and reduces the incidence of secondary osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wouter Schroven; G Vles; J Verhaegen; M Roussot; J Bellemans; S Konan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Subclinical cartilage degeneration in young athletes with posterior cruciate ligament injuries detected with T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging mapping.

Authors:  Ken Okazaki; Yukihisa Takayama; Kanji Osaki; Yoshio Matsuo; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Hiroshi Honda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Bin Li; Jia-Shi Wang; Ming He; Guang-Bin Wang; Peng Shen; Lun-Hao Bai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anatomic is better than isometric posterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement based upon in vivo simulation.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Axel J T Jens; Nathan H Varady; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Rob G H H Nelissen; Peter D Asnis; Robert F LaPrade; Samuel K Van de Velde; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ISOLATED POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PUBLISHED PROTOCOLS.

Authors:  Matthew Senese; Elliot Greenberg; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

10.  Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-.

Authors:  Yuichiro Maruyama; Katsuo Shitoto; Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.