Literature DB >> 17417819

Metal-assisted secondary ion mass spectrometry using atomic (Ga+, In+) and fullerene projectiles.

A Delcorte1, S Yunus, N Wehbe, N Nieuwjaer, C Poleunis, A Felten, L Houssiau, J-J Pireaux, P Bertrand.   

Abstract

The advantages and drawbacks of using either monatomic or buckminsterfullerene primary ions for metal-assisted secondary ion mass spectrometry (MetA-SIMS) are investigated using a series of organic samples including additive molecules, polyolefins, and small peptides. Gold deposition is mostly performed by sputter-coating, and in some cases, the results are compared to those of thermal evaporation (already used in a previous article: Delcorte, A.; Médard, N.; Bertrand, P. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 4955). The microstructure of the gold-covered sample surfaces is assessed by scanning and transmission electron microscopies. The merits of the different sets of experimental conditions are established via the analysis of fragment and parent-like ion yields. For most of the analyzed samples, the highest yields of fragment and parent-like ions are already reached with the sole use of C60+ projectiles. Metallization of the sample does not lead to a significant additional enhancement. For polyethylene and polypropylene, however, gold metallization associated with Ga+/In+ projectiles appears to be the only way to observe large cationized, sample-specific chain segments (m/z approximately 1000-2000). A detailed study of the polypropylene mass spectra as a function of gold coverage shows that the dynamics of yield enhancement by metal nanoparticles is strongly dependent on the choice of the projectile, e.g., a pronounced increase with Ga+ and a slow decay with C60+. The cases of Irganox 1010, a polymer antioxidant, and leucine enkephalin, a small peptide, allow us to investigate the specific influence of the experimental conditions on the emission of parent(like) ions such as M+, (M + Na)+, and (M + Au)+. The results show a dependence on both the type of sample and the considered secondary ion. Using theoretical and experimental arguments, the discussion identifies some of the mechanisms underlying the general trends observed in the results. Guidelines concerning the choice of the experimental conditions for MetA-SIMS are provided.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17417819     DOI: 10.1021/ac062406l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  5 in total

1.  Biomolecular imaging with a C60-SIMS/MALDI dual ion source hybrid mass spectrometer: instrumentation, matrix enhancement, and single cell analysis.

Authors:  Eric J Lanni; Sage J B Dunham; Peter Nemes; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Influence of the organic layer thickness in (metal-assisted) secondary ion mass spectrometry using Ga+ and C60+ projectiles.

Authors:  Nimer Wehbe; Taoufiq Mouhib; Aneesh Prabhakaran; Patrick Bertrand; Arnaud Delcorte
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Metal-assisted polyatomic SIMS and laser desorption/ionization for enhanced small molecule imaging of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Sage J B Dunham; Troy J Comi; Kyungwon Ko; Bin Li; Nameera F Baig; Nydia Morales-Soto; Joshua D Shrout; Paul W Bohn; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.456

4.  Multi-dimensional TOF-SIMS analysis for effective profiling of disease-related ions from the tissue surface.

Authors:  Ji-Won Park; Hyobin Jeong; Byeongsoo Kang; Su Jin Kim; Sang Yoon Park; Sokbom Kang; Hark Kyun Kim; Joon Sig Choi; Daehee Hwang; Tae Geol Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  (CO2)n+, (H2O)n+, and (H2O)n+ (CO2) gas cluster ion beam secondary ion mass spectrometry: analysis of lipid extracts, cells, and Alzheimer's model mouse brain tissue.

Authors:  Kelly Dimovska Nilsson; Anthi Karagianni; Ibrahim Kaya; Marcus Henricsson; John S Fletcher
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.142

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.