Literature DB >> 17415543

[Aspects of pain therapy: a survey of neurologic care in Germany].

K Gerbershagen1, V Limmroth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The state of organized care of neurologic pain patients in Germany was to be established with the the help of our survey.
METHODS: A five-page questionnaire was sent to 391 neurologic department heads.
RESULTS: Nearly 60% of the departments participated in the survey. Almost all neurologic departments admit pain patients, especially for further diagnostics and neurologic treatment. These are accepted as important neurologic tasks. The quality of care is excellent. For the diagnostics of chronic pain, multidimensional questionnaires are used in nearly 64% of the departments and psychometric tests in almost 70%. Sixty percent of all units document the acute course of pain treatment. Follow-up examinations are performed in 26% of all hospitals.
CONCLUSION: Structures exist concerning diagnostics and therapy for neurological in- and outpatients with pain. Care procedures for inpatients with pain need improvement. Outcome is seldom documented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17415543     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-007-2259-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  23 in total

1.  The course of non-malignant chronic pain: a 12-year follow-up of a cohort from the general population.

Authors:  H Ingemar Andersson
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  ["Quality of life" in the former and new Germany].

Authors:  G Henrich; P Herschbach; M von Rad
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  1992-01

3.  Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory.

Authors:  A T Beck; R A Steer
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1984-11

4.  An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; J Whyte; A Dowson; K Kolodner; J N Liberman; J Sawyer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-09-22       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).

Authors:  M Pfingsten; B Kröner-Herwig; E Leibing; U Kronshage; J Hildebrandt
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Changes in chronic pain severity over time: the Chronic Pain Grade as a valid measure.

Authors:  A M Elliott; B H Smith; W C Smith; W A Chambers
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; K M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 8.  Chronic pain secondary to disability: a review.

Authors:  Dawn M Ehde; Mark P Jensen; Joyce M Engel; Judith A Turner; Amy J Hoffman; Diana D Cardenas
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data.

Authors:  R C Tait; C A Pollard; R B Margolis; P N Duckro; S J Krause
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale.

Authors:  R Philip Snaith
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.