Literature DB >> 3606368

The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data.

R C Tait, C A Pollard, R B Margolis, P N Duckro, S J Krause.   

Abstract

The Pain Disability Index (PDI) is a brief instrument that was developed to assess pain-related disability, providing information that complements assessment of physical impairment. This paper presents the results of two studies concerning the psychometric properties and the validity of the PDI. In study I, PDI scores of 108 patients appeared internally consistent (alpha = .86), although a factor analysis revealed two factors. The first factor (59.3% of variance) seemed to include more discretionary, less obligatory activities. The second factor (14.3% of variance) included activities more basic to daily living and survival. Study II found that the PDI scores of 37 former inpatients were significantly higher than 36 former outpatients who responded to a follow-up questionnaire. These findings support the validity of the PDI. Several methodologic issues are discussed, and suggestions are made for future uses of the instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3606368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  106 in total

1.  [Psychometric properties of the pain drawing and the Ransford technique in patients with chronic low back pain].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; M Baller; H Liebeck; J Strube; J Hildebrandt; P Schöps
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Coping, catastrophizing and chronic pain in breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott R Bishop; David Warr
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

3.  Secondary prevention of work disability: community-based psychosocial intervention for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Michael J L Sullivan; L Charles Ward; Dean Tripp; Douglas J French; Heather Adams; William D Stanish
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

4.  Pain catastrophizing, activity engagement and pain willingness as predictors of the benefits of multidisciplinary cognitive behaviorally-based chronic pain treatment.

Authors:  Jordi Miró; Elena Castarlenas; Rocío de la Vega; Santiago Galán; Elisabet Sánchez-Rodríguez; Mark P Jensen; Douglas Cane
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  Substance misuse treatment for high-risk chronic pain patients on opioid therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert N Jamison; Edgar L Ross; Edward Michna; Li Q Chen; Caroline Holcomb; Ajay D Wasan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  Alexander K Asante; E Sharon Brintnell; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03

7.  The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation.

Authors:  Michael J L Sullivan; Heather Adams; Sharon Horan; Denise Maher; Dan Boland; Richard Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-06-07

8.  The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L Gibson; J Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

9.  Usability of the Participation and Quality of Life (PAR-QoL) Outcomes Toolkit Website for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Maude Beaudoin; Krista L Best; François Routhier; Lynda Atack; Sander L Hitzig; Dahlia Kairy
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2020

10.  Validation of a brief Opioid Compliance Checklist for patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Robert N Jamison; Marc O Martel; Robert R Edwards; Jing Qian; Kerry Anne Sheehan; Edgar L Ross
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.