PURPOSE: Further clarification of the nature of cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia is needed to aid the endophenotype approach to the understanding of the genetic basis of the disorder. This review summarizes recent neuropsychological studies of schizophrenia, aimed at establishing whether there are valid forms of cognitive impairment that can be defined with the use of neuropsychological measures in patients with schizophrenia, and studies that have attempted to relate specific neuropsychological findings to genetic polymorphisms. RECENT FINDINGS: There is good evidence for significant cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia. It is not yet clear, however, whether this heterogeneity is better accounted for by a general loss of function, varying in degree between different patients, or by impairment in specific cognitive abilities, for example working memory. Molecular genetic studies have provided evidence for associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms with both specific and general impairments, with some additional support for a working memory deficit from neuroimaging studies. SUMMARY: Larger, better controlled studies are needed before the genetic sources of cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia can be accurately characterized. This will be aided with the development and use of more specific neuropsychological tasks that can accurately discriminate between different cognitive domains.
PURPOSE: Further clarification of the nature of cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia is needed to aid the endophenotype approach to the understanding of the genetic basis of the disorder. This review summarizes recent neuropsychological studies of schizophrenia, aimed at establishing whether there are valid forms of cognitive impairment that can be defined with the use of neuropsychological measures in patients with schizophrenia, and studies that have attempted to relate specific neuropsychological findings to genetic polymorphisms. RECENT FINDINGS: There is good evidence for significant cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia. It is not yet clear, however, whether this heterogeneity is better accounted for by a general loss of function, varying in degree between different patients, or by impairment in specific cognitive abilities, for example working memory. Molecular genetic studies have provided evidence for associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms with both specific and general impairments, with some additional support for a working memory deficit from neuroimaging studies. SUMMARY: Larger, better controlled studies are needed before the genetic sources of cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia can be accurately characterized. This will be aided with the development and use of more specific neuropsychological tasks that can accurately discriminate between different cognitive domains.
Authors: R E Straub; C J MacLean; Y Ma; B T Webb; M V Myakishev; C Harris-Kerr; B Wormley; H Sadek; B Kadambi; F A O'Neill; D Walsh; K S Kendler Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2002 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Christopher M Wilk; James M Gold; Robert P McMahon; Katherine Humber; Virginia N Iannone; Robert W Buchanan Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Keith H Nuechterlein; Deanna M Barch; James M Gold; Terry E Goldberg; Michael F Green; Robert K Heaton Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M F Egan; T E Goldberg; B S Kolachana; J H Callicott; C M Mazzanti; R E Straub; D Goldman; D R Weinberger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Venkata S Mattay; Terry E Goldberg; Francesco Fera; Ahmad R Hariri; Alessandro Tessitore; Michael F Egan; Bhaskar Kolachana; Joseph H Callicott; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-04-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Janusz K Rybakowski; Alina Borkowska; Maria Skibinska; Aleksandra Szczepankiewicz; Pawel Kapelski; Anna Leszczynska-Rodziewicz; Piotr M Czerski; Joanna Hauser Journal: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.188
Authors: Erin Stolz; Krishna M Pancholi; Dhruman D Goradia; Sarah Paul; Matcheri S Keshavan; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Konasale M Prasad Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Susan S Kuo; Laura Almasy; Ruben C Gur; Konasale Prasad; David R Roalf; Raquel E Gur; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Michael F Pogue-Geile Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2018-02
Authors: Marianne O Klein; Daniella S Battagello; Ariel R Cardoso; David N Hauser; Jackson C Bittencourt; Ricardo G Correa Journal: Cell Mol Neurobiol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 5.046
Authors: S-H Lin; C-M Liu; Y-L Liu; C Shen-Jang Fann; P-C Hsiao; J-Y Wu; S-I Hung; C-H Chen; H-M Wu; Y-S Jou; S K Liu; T J Hwang; M H Hsieh; C-C Chang; W-C Yang; J-J Lin; F H-C Chou; S V Faraone; M T Tsuang; H-G Hwu; W J Chen Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 3.449