OBJECTIVES: We describe electronic health data use by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in the month after Katrina, including supporting technologies, the extent and nature of information accessed, and lessons learned. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using cross-sectional panels of data collected sequentially over time. RESULTS: By September 30, 2005, clinical data were accessed electronically for at least 38% (14941 of 39910) of patients cared for prior to Hurricane Katrina by New Orleans-area VA medical facilities. Approximately 1000 patients per day had data accessed during the month following Hurricane Katrina, a rate approximately two thirds of pre-Katrina values. Health care data were transmitted to more than 200 sites in 48 states and to at least 2300 users. CONCLUSIONS: The VA electronic health records supported continuity of care for evacuated veterans after Katrina. Our findings suggest that pharmacy and laboratory computerization alone will not be sufficient for future disaster support systems.
OBJECTIVES: We describe electronic health data use by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in the month after Katrina, including supporting technologies, the extent and nature of information accessed, and lessons learned. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using cross-sectional panels of data collected sequentially over time. RESULTS: By September 30, 2005, clinical data were accessed electronically for at least 38% (14941 of 39910) of patients cared for prior to Hurricane Katrina by New Orleans-area VA medical facilities. Approximately 1000 patients per day had data accessed during the month following Hurricane Katrina, a rate approximately two thirds of pre-Katrina values. Health care data were transmitted to more than 200 sites in 48 states and to at least 2300 users. CONCLUSIONS: The VA electronic health records supported continuity of care for evacuated veterans after Katrina. Our findings suggest that pharmacy and laboratory computerization alone will not be sufficient for future disaster support systems.
Authors: H L Bleich; R F Beckley; G L Horowitz; J D Jackson; E S Moody; C Franklin; S R Goodman; M W McKay; R A Pope; T Walden Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1985-03-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Timothy P Hogan; Sally A Holmes; Lauren M Rapacki; Charlesnika T Evans; Laurie Lindblom; Helen Hoenig; Barry Goldstein; Bridget Hahm; Frances M Weaver Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Martha I Arrieta; Rachel D Foreman; Errol D Crook; Marjorie L Icenogle Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Makoto Jones; Scott L DuVall; Joshua Spuhl; Matthew H Samore; Christopher Nielson; Michael Rubin Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Dirk-Jan den Ouden; Peter G van der Velden; Linda Grievink; Mattijn Morren; Anja J E Dirkzwager; C Joris Yzermans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 3.295