Literature DB >> 17412150

Survival strategies for radiology: some practical tips on how to reduce the risk of being sued and losing.

Michael M Raskin1.   

Abstract

The average indemnification for radiologists has tripled in the past 15 years, making risk management in radiology necessary to reduce the threat of being sued and losing. More than 75% of radiology lawsuits allege failure to diagnose or failure to communicate in a timely manner: ultimately, one third of these lawsuits are lost by the radiologist. A failure to communicate results in a timely manner is one of the greatest problems facing radiologists today, and it is a causal factor in 80% of lawsuits. Although rarely the primary factor for these suits, this is the one area in medical malpractice litigation in which radiologists can play a crucial role in reducing risk and liability. This article provides some practical tips on how to reduce the risk for being sued and losing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17412150     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

1.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

2.  First year radiology residents not taking call: will there be a difference?

Authors:  William M Strub; James L Leach; Jun Ying; Achala Vagal
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-01-25

Review 3.  Errors in multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  M A Mazzei; L Volterrani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Ethical problems in radiology: medical error and disclosure.

Authors:  N Magnavita; G Magnavita; A Fileni; A Bergamaschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Journal club: Renal masses detected at abdominal CT: radiologists' adherence to guidelines regarding management recommendations and communication of critical results.

Authors:  Cleo K Maehara; Stuart G Silverman; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Image perception and interpretation of abnormalities; can we believe our eyes? Can we do something about it?

Authors:  Durr-E- Sabih; Ayan Sabih; Quratulain Sabih; Ali N Khan
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-10-24

Review 7.  Use of contrast media in diagnostic imaging: medico-legal considerations.

Authors:  C Pomara; N Pascale; F Maglietta; M Neri; I Riezzo; E Turillazzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Influence of Prior Imaging Information on Diagnostic Accuracy for Focal Skeletal Processes-A Retrospective Analysis of the Consistency between Biopsy-Verified Imaging Diagnoses.

Authors:  Mine Benedicte Lange; Lars J Petersen; Mads Lausen; Niels Henrik Bruun; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Helle D Zacho
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17

9.  Malpractice in radiology: what should you worry about?

Authors:  Alessandro Cannavale; Mariangela Santoni; Paola Mancarella; Roberto Passariello; Paolo Arbarello
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2013-04-03

10.  Medical disciplinary jurisprudence in alleged malpractice in radiology: 10-year Dutch experience.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.