Literature DB >> 17412134

Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.

Mark B Williams1, Martin J Yaffe, Andrew D A Maidment, Melissa C Martin, J Anthony Seibert, Etta D Pisano.   

Abstract

This paper on digital mammography image acquisition is 1 of 3 papers written as part of an intersociety effort to establish image quality standards for digital mammography. The information included in this paper is intended to support the development of an ACR guideline on image quality for digital mammography. The topics of the other 2 papers are digital mammography image display and digital mammography image storage, transmission, and retrieval. The societies represented in compiling this document were the Radiological Society of North America, the ACR, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, and the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology. These papers describe in detail what is known to improve image quality for digital mammography and make recommendations about how digital mammography should be performed to optimize the visualization of breast cancers. Through the publication of these papers, the ACR is seeking input from industry, radiologists, and other interested parties on their contents so that the final ACR guideline for digital mammography will represent the consensus of the broader community interested in these topics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17412134     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Margarita Zuley; Janet K Baum; Helga S Marques
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Authors:  Kalpana M Kanal; Elizabeth Krupinski; Eric A Berns; William R Geiser; Andrew Karellas; Martha B Mainiero; Melissa C Martin; Samir B Patel; Daniel L Rubin; Jon D Shepard; Eliot L Siegel; Judith A Wolfman; Tariq A Mian; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Elodia B Cole; Helga S Marques; Martin J Yaffe; Meredith Blevins; Emily F Conant; R Edward Hendrick; Janet K Baum; Laurie L Fajardo; Roberta A Jong; Marcia A Koomen; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Yeonhee Lee; Dag Pavic; Sora C Yoon; Wittaya Padungchaichote; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.