Literature DB >> 17412098

Technology and perception in the 21st-century reading room.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1.   

Abstract

Radiology reading rooms have changed dramatically over the past 15 years, moving from analog-light-box-based environments to digital-display-based environments. Most of the focus in the early stages of this transition was on the technology, but it soon became obvious that it was not possible or even prudent to consider the technology without considering radiologists. The information being presented to radiologists in digital reading rooms is in many ways very different from that presented on traditional film. On one hand, the digital workstation display medium itself is very different from traditional film images hung on light boxes. On the other hand, without large-area light boxes, images such as those from computed tomography (CT) can no longer be displayed all at once in a series of film sheets. The digital world also introduces the possibility of manipulating image data in ways that were never possible with analog film. Not only can radiologists manipulate image data with various image-processing tools, but also, computers can analyze images and provide even more information to incorporate into the interpretation process. As a consequence of these differences, it has been necessary to focus attention on radiologists to discover ways to optimize the digital reading environment with respect to the human visual system and the way the eye-brain system processes information. This article reviews some of the important perceptual issues that have arisen in the digital reading rooms of the 21st century.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17412098     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions.

Authors:  R Raitz; J N R Assunção Junior; M Fenyo-Pereira; L Correa; L P de Lima
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Reducing error in radiographic interpretation.

Authors:  Kate Alexander
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Opportunities in IT Support of Workflow & Information Flow in the Emergency Department Digital Imaging Process.

Authors:  R J Fairbanks; T K Guarrera; A B Bisantz; M Venturino; P L Westesson
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2010-09-01

4.  Visual perception of multilocular radiolucent mandibular lesions quantified by morphometric analysis.

Authors:  R Raitz; A L V Rodrigues; V C R Reis; R C Borra
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Visual Illusions in Radiology: Untrue Perceptions in Medical Images and Their Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Ergonomic strategies to improve radiographers' posture during mammography activities.

Authors:  Nicolai Cernean; Florentino Serranheira; Pedro Gonçalves; Cláudia Sá Dos Reis
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.