Literature DB >> 17411941

Comparison of recent utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging among radiologists and cardiologists.

David C Levin1, Charles M Intenzo, Vijay M Rao, Andrea J Frangos, Laurence Parker, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study recent practice patterns in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and related procedures among radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The nationwide Medicare administrative Part B claims summary databases from 1998 and 2002 were used to assess utilization rate changes in the 4 primary procedure codes for MPI, the seven codes for diagnostic cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography, and the single code for stress echocardiography. Rate changes among radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians were determined for the total Medicare population, as well as for the 3 primary places of service at which imaging is formed: hospital inpatient facilities, hospital outpatient facilities, and private offices. Ratios of the use of the 2 supplementary codes for left ventricular (LV) wall motion and ejection fraction to that of the primary MPI codes were calculated for 2002.
RESULTS: The utilization rate per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries of MPI rose among radiologists from 19.8 in 1998 to 20.1 in 2002, a 2% increase. The rate among cardiologists rose from 22.9 in 1998 to 40.7 in 2002, a 78% increase. Most of this growth occurred in cardiologists' offices, where the utilization rate increased 101% over the 4 years. In 2002, the ratios of the use of the supplementary LV wall motion and ejection fraction codes to that of the primary MPI codes were 1.73 for cardiologists and 1.46 among radiologists. Between 1998 and 2002, the utilization of diagnostic cardiac catheterization among cardiologists increased by 19%, and their utilization of stress echocardiography increased by 21%.
CONCLUSION: In recent years within the Medicare population, the rate of utilization of MPI among radiologists has remained relatively stable, whereas it has risen sharply among cardiologists. The greatest growth was seen in cardiologists' private offices. This raises concerns about possible inappropriate utilization of MPI and also about the potential effect self-referral has on this utilization trend. The increased use of MPI by cardiologists did not result in reduction in their use of either cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography or stress echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411941     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Laboratory test ordering at physician offices with and without on-site laboratories.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Utilization rates of neuroradiology across neuroscience specialties in the private office setting: who owns or leases the scanners on which studies are performed?

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem; L Parker; D C Levin; V Rao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  2009 ASNC keynote lecture: measuring cost, cost-effectiveness, and quality in cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them.

Authors:  Sharon W Kwan; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Robert K Kerlan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Facts and figures on CAD assessment with SPECT and PET-CT.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Do imaging studies performed in physician offices increase downstream utilization?: an empiric analysis of cardiac stress testing with imaging.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Reza Fazel; Joseph S Ross; Robert L McNamara; Andrew J Einstein; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Harlan M Krumholz; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06

Review 8.  Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Islam Y Elgendy; Ahmed Mahmoud; Jonathan J Shuster; Rami Doukky; David E Winchester
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  The true cost of cardiovascular imaging: focusing on downstream, indirect, and environmental costs.

Authors:  Larissa Braga; Bruna Vinci; Carlo G Leo; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.062

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.