Literature DB >> 17411408

Facemask design, facial deposition, and delivered dose of nebulized aerosols.

Gerald C Smaldone1, Sanjay Sangwan, Akbar Shah.   

Abstract

Nebulizers are often interfaced to patients using facemasks, especially when the patient is sick and uncooperative. Tight-fitting masks are thought to improve drug delivery, but recent studies have indicated that facemask seal can impact facial and eye deposition of aerosol. The purpose of the present study was to define the factors that influence drug delivery to the lung in pediatric patients using nebulizers and facemasks; particularly the roles of facemask seal, mask vents and nebulizer flow. Using a pediatric face facsimile and radiolabeled saline aerosols front-loaded and bottom-loaded nebulizers were tested for aerosol delivery during a pediatric pattern of breathing. Gamma scintigraphy provided images of the face. Filters measured drug delivery to the patient (inhaled mass [IM]). All data were reported as percent (%) nebulizer charge. Nebulizer flows of 4 and 8 L/min were tested. Preliminary experiments suggested that inertial forces between the edge of the mask and the face were responsible for facial and eye deposition. Front-loaded nebulizers were more efficient than bottom-loaded systems in delivering drug to the patient but favored eye deposition. These observations led to the design of a mask prototype constructed to maximize aerosol delivery to the patient with reduced deposition on the face and in the eyes. Modifications included vents and specialized cutouts in the region of the eyes. A tight fitting front-loaded mask delivered an IM of 6.38 +/- 0.42% (mean +/- SE) with facial and eye deposition of 1.76 +/- 0.17% and 1.14 +/- 0.15% respectively. The presence of specialized eye cutouts minimized facial and eye deposition (0.72 +/- 0.07%, and 0.15 +/- 0.02% [P < 0.0001]), even in the presence of increased nebulizer flow. The prototype design at 4 L/min maximized IM to 8.78 +/- 0.98% and further reduced facial and eye deposition (0.66 +/- 0.07% and 0.09 +/- 0.01%). Commercial bottom loaded masks reduced IM to 2.33 +/- 0.22%, with significant deposition on the face (1.43 +/- 0.16%). For aerosol therapy with nebulizers in pediatric patients, facemask design is a key factor in maximizing aerosol delivery to the patient while minimizing deposition on the face and in the eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17411408     DOI: 10.1089/jam.2007.0579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  11 in total

Review 1.  A path to successful patient outcomes through aerosol drug delivery to children: a narrative review.

Authors:  Arzu Ari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Measurements of deposited aerosol dose in infants and small children.

Authors:  Timothy E Corcoran
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 3.  Devices for Improved Delivery of Nebulized Pharmaceutical Aerosols to the Lungs.

Authors:  Worth Longest; Benjamin Spence; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.849

4.  Development of an Inline Dry Powder Inhaler for Oral or Trans-Nasal Aerosol Administration to Children.

Authors:  Dale Farkas; Michael Hindle; Serena Bonasera; Karl Bass; Worth Longest
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 5.  Drug delivery interfaces: A way to optimize inhalation therapy in spontaneously breathing children.

Authors:  Arzu Ari
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-08

6.  Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Jason A Suggett
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  High-Efficiency Dry Powder Aerosol Delivery to Children: Review and Application of New Technologies.

Authors:  Karl Bass; Dale Farkas; Amr Hassan; Serena Bonasera; Michael Hindle; P Worth Longest
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.433

Review 8.  Inhaled chemotherapy in lung cancer: future concept of nanomedicine.

Authors:  Paul Zarogoulidis; Ekaterini Chatzaki; Konstantinos Porpodis; Kalliopi Domvri; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Eugene P Goldberg; Nikos Karamanos; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-03-22

9.  The challenge of delivering therapeutic aerosols to asthma patients.

Authors:  Federico Lavorini
Journal:  ISRN Allergy       Date:  2013-08-05

Review 10.  Inhalation therapy in mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Juçara Gasparetto Maccari; Cassiano Teixeira; Marcelo Basso Gazzana; Augusto Savi; Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer-Neto; Marli Maria Knorst
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.