Literature DB >> 17410125

A new perceptual illusion reveals mechanisms of sensory decoding.

Mehrdad Jazayeri1, J Anthony Movshon.   

Abstract

Perceptual illusions are usually thought to arise from the way sensory signals are encoded by the brain, and indeed are often used to infer the mechanisms of sensory encoding. But perceptual illusions might also result from the way the brain decodes sensory information, reflecting the strategies that optimize performance in particular tasks. In a fine discrimination task, the most accurate information comes from neurons tuned away from the discrimination boundary, and observers seem to use signals from these 'displaced' neurons to optimize their performance. We wondered whether using signals from these neurons might also bias perception. In a fine direction discrimination task using moving random-dot stimuli, we found that observers' perception of the direction of motion is indeed biased away from the boundary. This misperception can be accurately described by a decoding model that preferentially weights signals from neurons whose responses best discriminate those directions. In a coarse discrimination task, to which a different decoding rule applies, the same stimulus is not misperceived, suggesting that the illusion is a direct consequence of the decoding strategy that observers use to make fine perceptual judgments. The subjective experience of motion is therefore not mediated directly by the responses of sensory neurons, but is only developed after the responses of these neurons are decoded.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17410125      PMCID: PMC3010210          DOI: 10.1038/nature05739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  12 in total

1.  Different populations of neurons contribute to the detection and discrimination of visual motion.

Authors:  K Hol; S Treue
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Visual illusions and neurobiology.

Authors:  D M Eagleman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-16       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception.

Authors:  A J Parker; W T Newsome
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes.

Authors:  H S Seung; H Sompolinsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  A F Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; A F Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  67 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Basing perceptual decisions on the most informative sensory neurons.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Attention alters feature space in motion processing.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; John Houde; Feng Rong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Flexible interpretation of a decision rule by supplementary eye field neurons.

Authors:  S J Heinen; H Hwang; S N Yang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Do humans make good decisions?

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Adaptive allocation of attentional gain.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Suppression during binocular rivalry broadens orientation tuning.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.