Literature DB >> 17409408

Evidence that in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells, which lack DNA polymerase eta, DNA polymerase iota causes the very high frequency and unique spectrum of UV-induced mutations.

Yun Wang1, Roger Woodgate, Terrence P McManus, Samantha Mead, J Justin McCormick, Veronica M Maher.   

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) patients have normal DNA excision repair, yet are predisposed to develop sunlight-induced cancer. They exhibit a 25-fold higher than normal frequency of UV-induced mutations and very unusual kinds (spectrum), mainly transversions. The primary defect in XPV cells is the lack of functional DNA polymerase (Pol) eta, the translesion synthesis DNA polymerase that readily inserts adenine nucleotides opposite photoproducts involving thymine. The high frequency and striking difference in kinds of UV-induced mutations in XPV cells strongly suggest that, in the absence of Pol eta, an abnormally error-prone polymerase substitutes. In vitro replication studies of Pol iota show that it replicates past 5'T-T3' and 5'T-U3' cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, incorporating G or T nucleotides opposite the 3' nucleotide. To test the hypothesis that Pol iota causes the high frequency and abnormal spectrum of UV-induced mutations in XPV cells, we identified an unlimited lifespan XPV cell line expressing two forms of Pol iota, whose frequency of UV-induced mutations is twice that of XPV cells expressing one form. We eliminated expression of one form and compared the parental cells and derivatives for the frequency and kinds of UV-induced mutations. All exhibited similar sensitivity to the cytotoxicity of UV((254 nm)), and the kinds of mutations induced were identical, but the frequency of mutations induced in the derivatives was reduced to </=50% that of the parent. These data strongly support the hypothesis that in cells lacking Pol eta, Pol iota is responsible for the high frequency and abnormal spectrum of UV-induced mutations, and ultimately their malignant transformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17409408     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  59 in total

1.  What a difference a decade makes: insights into translesion DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 3.  Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Lauren S Waters; Brenda K Minesinger; Mary Ellen Wiltrout; Sanjay D'Souza; Rachel V Woodruff; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Y-family DNA polymerases in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Caixia Guo; J Nicole Kosarek-Stancel; Tie-Shan Tang; Errol C Friedberg
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Exploring the roles of nucleobase desolvation and shape complementarity during the misreplication of O(6)-methylguanine.

Authors:  Delia Chavarria; Andrea Ramos-Serrano; Ichiro Hirao; Anthony J Berdis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Accommodation of an N-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-acetylaminofluorene adduct in the active site of human DNA polymerase iota: Hoogsteen or Watson-Crick base pairing?

Authors:  Kerry Donny-Clark; Robert Shapiro; Suse Broyde
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Genetic diversity in melanoma metastases from a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Xiao Hui Tan; John J DiGiovanna; Chyi-Chia Richard Lee; Jere B Stern; Mark Raffeld; Elaine S Jaffe; Kenneth H Kraemer
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Y-family polymerase conformation is a major determinant of fidelity and translesion specificity.

Authors:  Ryan C Wilson; Meghan A Jackson; Janice D Pata
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  p53 suppression overwhelms DNA polymerase eta deficiency in determining the cellular UV DNA damage response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Laposa; Luzviminda Feeney; Eileen Crowley; Sebastien de Feraudy; James E Cleaver
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-09-05

10.  Structural basis of error-prone replication and stalling at a thymine base by human DNA polymerase iota.

Authors:  Kevin N Kirouac; Hong Ling
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.