Literature DB >> 17408728

Sparing of saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulval malignancies.

Xiaoling Zhang1, Xiugui Sheng, Jun Niu, Huiqin Li, Dapeng Li, Ling Tang, Qingshui Li, Qingju Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This work was set out to investigate the effect of saphenous vein preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for patients with vulval malignancies.
METHODS: 64 patients with vulval malignancies were allocated into two groups depending on their clinical stages, with one of them (31 patients included) being subjected to sparing of saphenous vein and the other to saphenous vein ligated surgery while treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy. The operative time, blood loss, 5-year survival rate, short- and long-term postoperative complications, 5-year survival rate and groin recurrence were selected as the monitored parameters, through which the above two groups were compared with each other using t test, chi2 and life table analysis.
RESULTS: (1) The median operative time for bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy was 155 min (130-170 min) in the sparing group, compared to 140 min (120-170 min) in the excision group (P>0.05). The median intraoperative blood loss was 295 mL (100-450 mL) in the sparing group, and 270 mL (150-390 mL) in the excision group (P>0.05). (2) Short-term lower extremity lymphedema occurred with 27 patients (43.5%) in the sparing group and 44 patients (66.7%) in the excision group (P<0.01). Still, short-term lower extremity phlebitis was observed with 7 patients (11.3%) in the sparing group while 17 developed phlebitis (25.8%) in the excision group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in postoperative fever, acute cellulites, seroma, or lymphocyst formation. (3) Long-term complication occurrence rate decreased by about 50% in patients subjected to saphenous vein sparing surgery compared with those to ligated surgery, while there was no remarkable difference between two groups in the occurrence rates of phlebitis and deep venous thrombosis (P>0.05). (4) The overall 5-year survival rate was 67.3%, with 66.7% and 68.0% for the excision group and the sparing group, respectively (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The application of saphenous vein preservation technique during inguinal lymphadenectomy for patients with vulval malignancies could significantly decrease the occurrence rate of postoperative complications without compromising outcomes and should be widely put into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17408728     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

1.  Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Sharon B Chang; Robert L Askew; Yan Xing; Storm Weaver; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Richard Royal; Anthony Lucci; Merrick I Ross; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Simona F Shaitelman; Kate D Cromwell; John C Rasmussen; Nicole L Stout; Jane M Armer; Bonnie B Lasinski; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Association of lymphatic flow velocity with surgical outcomes in patients undergoing lymphovenous anastomosis for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Joseph Kyu-Hyung Park; Junggyo Seo; Eun Joo Yang; Yusuhn Kang; Chan Yeong Heo; Yujin Myung
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.

Authors:  Philippe E Spiess; Mike S Hernandez; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Morbidity of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in vulval cancer.

Authors:  A A Soliman; M Heubner; R Kimmig; P Wimberger
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-01-04

Review 6.  Breast and gynecologic cancer-related extremity lymphedema: a review of diagnostic modalities and management options.

Authors:  Pankaj Tiwari; Michelle Coriddi; Ritu Salani; Stephen P Povoski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Feasibility of internal inguinoperitoneal drainage after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Peter Dall; Thomas Hildebrandt; Andreas du Bois; Eric Boetel; Janine Ahlfaenger; Matthias W Beckmann; Mareike Bommert
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Robotic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer, development of a technique without robot repositioning: a case report.

Authors:  Rene Sotelo; Marino Cabrera; Oswaldo Carmona; Robert de Andrade; Oscar Martin; Golena Fernandez
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-09-26

9.  The first leg video endoscopic groin lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Angelica Naldini; Cristiano Rossitto; Andrea Morciano; Giovanni Panico; Giuseppe Campagna; Pierluigi Paparella; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-04

Review 10.  Feasibility and Safety of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chai-E Liu; Yan Lu; De-Sheng Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.