Literature DB >> 17407911

Echo-intensity compensation in echolocating bats (Pipistrellus abramus) during flight measured by a telemetry microphone.

Shizuko Hiryu1, Tomotaka Hagino, Hiroshi Riquimaroux, Yoshiaki Watanabe.   

Abstract

An onboard microphone (Telemike) was developed to examine changes in the basic characteristics of echolocation sounds of small frequency-modulated echolocating bats, Pipistrellus abramus. Using a dual high-speed video camera system, spatiotemporal observations of echolocation characteristics were conducted on bats during a landing flight task in the laboratory. The Telemike allowed us to observe emitted pulses and returning echoes to which the flying bats listened during flight, and the acoustic parameters could be precisely measured without traditional problems such as the directional properties of the recording microphone and the emitted pulse, or traveling loss of the sound in the air. Pulse intensity in bats intending to land exhibited a marked decrease by 30 dB within 2 m of the target wall, and the reduction rate was approximately 6.5 dB per halving of distance. The intensity of echoes returning from the target wall indicated a nearly constant intensity (-42.6 +/- 5.5 dB weaker than the pulse emitted in search phase) within a target distance of 2 m. These findings provide direct evidence that bats adjust pulse intensity to compensate for changes in echo intensity to maintain a constant intensity of the echo returned from the approaching target at an optimal range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407911     DOI: 10.1121/1.2431337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Yu Shiori; Tatsuro Hosokawa; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evoked potential study of the inferior collicular response to constant frequency-frequency modulation (CF-FM) sounds in FM and CF-FM bats.

Authors:  Ziying Fu; Na Xu; Guimin Zhang; Dandan Zhou; Long Liu; Jia Tang; Philip Hung-Sun Jen; Qicai Chen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Reconstruction of vocal interactions in a group of small songbirds.

Authors:  Victor N Anisimov; Joshua A Herbst; Andrei N Abramchuk; Alexander V Latanov; Richard H R Hahnloser; Alexei L Vyssotski
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Echolocating bats use future-target information for optimal foraging.

Authors:  Emyo Fujioka; Ikkyu Aihara; Miwa Sumiya; Kazuyuki Aihara; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  When echolocating bats do not echolocate.

Authors:  Chen Chiu; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2008

9.  Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats.

Authors:  Jedediah Tressler; Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Ryan D Wagner; William E Conner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.