Hansjoerg Wertz1, Frank Lohr, Barbara Dobler, Sabine Mai, Frederik Wenz. 1. Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. hansjoerg.wertz@radonk.ma.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interfractional prostate motion during radiotherapy due to variation in rectal distension can have negative consequences. The authors investigated the dosimetric consequences of a linear translational position correction based on image guidance when a three-dimensional conformal treatment technique was used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Planning CTs of seven patients with empty and distended rectum were analyzed. A reference plan for the planning target volume (PTV) and the boost were calculated on the CT dataset with the empty rectum with a standard four-field technique. The treatment plan was transferred to the CT with the distended rectum for an uncorrected setup (referenced to bony anatomy) and a corrected setup after position correction of the isocenter. The dosimetric consequences were analyzed. RESULTS: Organ motion decreased the coverage of the prostate by the 95% isodose during simulated single treatment fractions by up to -21.0 percentage points (%-p; boost plan) and by up to -14.9%-p for the seminal vesicles (PTV plan). The mean rectum dose increased by up to 18.3%-p (PTV plan). Linear translational correction (mean 6.4 +/- 3.4 mm, maximum 10.8 mm) increased the coverage of the prostate by the 95% isodose by up to 12.7%-p (boost plan), while the mean rectum dose was reduced by up to -8.9%-p (PTV plan). For the complete treatment a reduction of complication probability of the rectum of approximately 5%-p was calculated. CONCLUSION: The use of an image guidance system with linear translational correction can improve radiation treatment accuracy for prostate cancer, if geometric changes are within certain limits.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interfractional prostate motion during radiotherapy due to variation in rectal distension can have negative consequences. The authors investigated the dosimetric consequences of a linear translational position correction based on image guidance when a three-dimensional conformal treatment technique was used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Planning CTs of seven patients with empty and distended rectum were analyzed. A reference plan for the planning target volume (PTV) and the boost were calculated on the CT dataset with the empty rectum with a standard four-field technique. The treatment plan was transferred to the CT with the distended rectum for an uncorrected setup (referenced to bony anatomy) and a corrected setup after position correction of the isocenter. The dosimetric consequences were analyzed. RESULTS: Organ motion decreased the coverage of the prostate by the 95% isodose during simulated single treatment fractions by up to -21.0 percentage points (%-p; boost plan) and by up to -14.9%-p for the seminal vesicles (PTV plan). The mean rectum dose increased by up to 18.3%-p (PTV plan). Linear translational correction (mean 6.4 +/- 3.4 mm, maximum 10.8 mm) increased the coverage of the prostate by the 95% isodose by up to 12.7%-p (boost plan), while the mean rectum dose was reduced by up to -8.9%-p (PTV plan). For the complete treatment a reduction of complication probability of the rectum of approximately 5%-p was calculated. CONCLUSION: The use of an image guidance system with linear translational correction can improve radiation treatment accuracy for prostate cancer, if geometric changes are within certain limits.
Authors: Anna O Simeonova; Katharina Fleckenstein; Hansjörg Wertz; Anian Frauenfeld; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2012-03
Authors: Tereza Kertesz; Markus K A Herrmann; Antonia Zapf; Hans Christiansen; Robert M Hermann; Olivier Pradier; Heinz Schmidberger; Clemens F Hess; Andrea Hille Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-09-12 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Markus Bohrer; Peter Schröder; Grit Welzel; Hansjörg Wertz; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Sabine Kathrin Mai Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Martin Pursch-Lee; Branka Asadpour; Bernd Gagel; Marc D Piroth; Jens Klotz; Sandra Nussen; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Tammo Gsänger; Arne Strauss; Tereza Kertesz; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Hilke Vorwerk; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Andrea Hille Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.621