Literature DB >> 17405253

Use of clinical signs and computed tomography myelography findings in detecting and excluding nerve root avulsion in complete brachial plexus palsy.

Jayme Augusto Bertelli1, Marcos Flávio Ghizoni.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of preoperative evaluation based on clinical testing and computed tomography (CT) myelography in differentiating root rupture (that is, graftable root) from root avulsion in total brachial plexus palsy.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with total brachial plexus palsy were clinically tested for the presence of phrenic nerve palsy, supraclavicular Tinel sign, shoulder protraction, Bernard-Horner syndrome, and hand pain. The patients underwent CT myelography and then underwent surgery. The combination of a positive Tinel sign and a positive shoulder protraction test accurately predicted the presence of a graftable root in 93.7% of the cases. A 96.8% rate of accuracy was attained if the results of the CT myelography were considered together with the clinical signs. The presence of Bernard-Horner syndrome and hand pain accurately indicated avulsion of the lower roots in 93.7% of the patients. Computed tomography myelography accurately predicted the condition of the lower roots in 100% of the cases. Total avulsion injury was observed in five cases (16%). The lower roots were avulsed in 94% of the cases. The C-5 and C-6 roots were grafted 40 times, and a suitable root stump for grafting lay in a retroscalenic position in 18 (45%) of the 40 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative assessment based on clinical examination and CT myelography allowed correct surgical planning in more than 90% of the cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17405253     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.6.835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  6 in total

1.  Results and current approach for Brachial Plexus reconstruction.

Authors:  Jayme A Bertelli; Marcos F Ghizoni
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2011-06-16

2.  The diagnostic value of CT myelography, MR myelography, and both in neonatal brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  R Tse; J N Nixon; R S Iyer; K A Kuhlman-Wood; G E Ishak
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Relocating the C5 nerve stump in C5 nerve grafting to prevent iatrogenic phrenic nerve injury.

Authors:  Katharine M Hinchcliff; Allen T Bishop; Alexander Y Shin; Robert J Spinner
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Approach to the Pan-brachial Plexus Injury: Variation in Surgical Strategies among Surgeons.

Authors:  Steven T Lanier; J Ryan Hill; Aimee S James; Liz Rolf; David M Brogan; Christopher J Dy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 5.  Comparison of Different In Vivo Animal Models of Brachial Plexus Avulsion and Its Application in Pain Study.

Authors:  Hang Xian; Rougang Xie; Ceng Luo; Rui Cong
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Respiratory failure due to diaphragm paralysis after brachial plexus injury diagnosed by point-of-care ultrasound.

Authors:  Wataru Yajima; Takuo Yoshida; Tatsuya Kondo; Masahiko Uzura
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.