Literature DB >> 24676008

The diagnostic value of CT myelography, MR myelography, and both in neonatal brachial plexus palsy.

R Tse1, J N Nixon2, R S Iyer2, K A Kuhlman-Wood3, G E Ishak2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although most infants with brachial plexus palsy recover function spontaneously, approximately 10-30% benefit from surgical treatment. Pre-operative screening for nerve root avulsions is helpful in planning reconstruction. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic value of CT myelography, MR myelography, and both against a surgical criterion standard for detection of complete nerve root avulsions in birth brachial plexus palsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients who underwent a preoperative CT and/or MR myelography and subsequent brachial plexus exploration were included. Imaging studies were analyzed for the presence of abnormalities potentially predictive of nerve root avulsion. Findings of nerve root avulsion on surgical exploration were used as the criterion standard to assess the predictive value of imaging findings.
RESULTS: Ninety-five root levels were examined. When the presence of any pseudomeningocele was used as a predictor, the sensitivity was 0.73 for CT and 0.68 for MR imaging and the specificity was 0.96 for CT and 0.97 for MR imaging. When presence of pseudomeningocele with absent rootlets was used as the predictor, the sensitivity was 0.68 for CT and 0.68 for MR imaging and the specificity was 0.96 for CT and 0.97 for MR imaging. The use of both CT and MR imaging did not increase diagnostic accuracy. Rootlet findings in the absence of pseudomeningocele were not helpful in predicting complete nerve root avulsion.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings of CT and MR myelography were highly correlated. Given the advantages of MR myelography, it is now the single technique for preoperative evaluation of nerve root avulsion at our institution.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24676008      PMCID: PMC7966578          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  45 in total

1.  Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography.

Authors:  Kazuteru Doi; Ken Otsuka; Yukinori Okamoto; Hiroshi Fujii; Yasunori Hattori; Amresh S Baliarsing
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Concordance and discrepancy between electrodiagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical root avulsion injuries.

Authors:  Po-Yi Tsai; Tien-Yow Chuang; Henrich Cheng; Hsiu-Mei Wu; Yue-Cune Chang; Chih-Pin Wang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Magnetic resonance myelography in brachial plexus injury.

Authors:  T Nakamura; Y Yabe; Y Horiuchi; S Takayama
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-09

4.  Utility of electrodiagnostic testing and computed tomography myelography in the preoperative evaluation of neonatal brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  Kelly L Vanderhave; Karen Bovid; Hilary Alpert; Kate Wan-Chu Chang; Douglas J Quint; James A Leonard; Lynda J S Yang
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Current concepts in the management of brachial plexus birth palsy.

Authors:  Holly B Hale; Donald S Bae; Peter M Waters
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Comparison of the natural history, the outcome of microsurgical repair, and the outcome of operative reconstruction in brachial plexus birth palsy.

Authors:  P M Waters
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Diagnosis and surgery of brachial plexus injuries.

Authors:  G Penkert; G A Carvalho; G Nikkhah; M Tatagiba; C Matthies; M Samii
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 8.  Klumpke's birth palsy. Does it really exist?

Authors:  M M al-Qattan; H M Clarke; C G Curtis
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1995-02

9.  Brachial plexopathy in infants after traumatic delivery: evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  S F Miller; C M Glasier; M L Griebel; F A Boop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for radiological assessment of neonatal brachial plexus injury.

Authors:  P C Francel; M Koby; T S Park; B C Lee; M J Noetzel; S E Mackinnon; M M Henegar; B A Kaufman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary imaging of the pediatric shoulder: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Helen H R Kim; Anh-Vu Ngo; Ezekiel Maloney; Jeffrey P Otjen; Ramesh S Iyer; Sarah J Menashe; Mahesh Thapa
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 2.  The natural history and management of brachial plexus birth palsy.

Authors:  Kristin L Buterbaugh; Apurva S Shah
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Clinical significance of cervical MRI in brachial plexus birth injury.

Authors:  Petra Grahn; Tiina Pöyhiä; Antti Sommarhem; Yrjänä Nietosvaara
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus. Part 2: Traumatic injuries.

Authors:  Pawel Szaro; Mats Geijer; Bogdan Ciszek; Aleksandra McGrath
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-01-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.