Adam B Smith1, Penny Wright, Peter Selby, Galina Velikova. 1. Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group, Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre in Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. A.B.Smith@leeds.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social difficulties may add to the psychological burden experienced by cancer patients. Therefore identifying social difficulties in routine oncology practice may help prevent or alleviate distress. The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI) is a short questionnaire developed for assessing social difficulties in cancer patients. Although well-validated, not enough is known about the clinical meaning and utility of the instrument or whether the items can be meaningfully summed to form a summary index of "Social Distress". PURPOSE: To determine, using Rasch analysis, whether the SDI could be used as a summary index of social distress specifically examining three fundamental criteria: item fit, unidimensionality and item invariance. METHODS: The Partial Credit Model was applied to a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients (n = 609) who had completed the SDI. RESULTS: Five items were identified as misfitting (infit mean square > or = 1.3 and standardised t-statistic > or = 2) and excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining items formed a unidimensional interval scale with no additional factors identified in a principal components analysis of the residuals. No differential item functioning was observed for age, gender, diagnosis, extent of disease or social deprivation. The 16-item SDI can be summed to produce an overall index of social distress, facilitating routine identification of social difficulties. Subsequent work is needed to evaluate whether the instrument is able to identify patients with high levels of social distress requiring intervention.
BACKGROUND: Social difficulties may add to the psychological burden experienced by cancer patients. Therefore identifying social difficulties in routine oncology practice may help prevent or alleviate distress. The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI) is a short questionnaire developed for assessing social difficulties in cancer patients. Although well-validated, not enough is known about the clinical meaning and utility of the instrument or whether the items can be meaningfully summed to form a summary index of "Social Distress". PURPOSE: To determine, using Rasch analysis, whether the SDI could be used as a summary index of social distress specifically examining three fundamental criteria: item fit, unidimensionality and item invariance. METHODS: The Partial Credit Model was applied to a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients (n = 609) who had completed the SDI. RESULTS: Five items were identified as misfitting (infit mean square > or = 1.3 and standardised t-statistic > or = 2) and excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining items formed a unidimensional interval scale with no additional factors identified in a principal components analysis of the residuals. No differential item functioning was observed for age, gender, diagnosis, extent of disease or social deprivation. The 16-item SDI can be summed to produce an overall index of social distress, facilitating routine identification of social difficulties. Subsequent work is needed to evaluate whether the instrument is able to identify patients with high levels of social distress requiring intervention.
Authors: Morten Aa Petersen; Mogens Groenvold; Jakob B Bjorner; Neil Aaronson; Thierry Conroy; Ann Cull; Peter Fayers; Marianne Hjermstad; Mirjam Sprangers; Marianne Sullivan Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: J B Bjorner; M Aa Petersen; M Groenvold; N Aaronson; M Ahlner-Elmqvist; J I Arraras; A Brédart; P Fayers; M Jordhoy; M Sprangers; M Watson; T Young Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: E P Wright; P J Selby; M Crawford; A Gillibrand; C Johnston; T J Perren; R Rush; A Smith; G Velikova; K Watson; A Gould; A Cull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Naheed Hanif; Nimarta Dharni; Adam Smith; Sangeeta Chattoo; Galina Velikova; Chris Bradley; Dan Stark; Penny Wright Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Adam B Smith; Robert Rush; Lesley J Fallowfield; Galina Velikova; Michael Sharpe Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 4.615