OBJECTIVE: ICU delirium is common and adverse. The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score ranges from 0 to 8, with a score of 4 or higher indicating clinical delirium. We investigated whether lower (subsyndromal) values affect outcome. PATIENTS: 600 patients were evaluated with the ICDSC every 8[Symbol: see text]h. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of 558 assessed patients 537 noncomatose patients were divided into three groups: no delirium (score = 0; n = 169, 31.5%), subsyndromal delirium (score = 1-3; n = 179, 33.3%), and clinical delirium (score >or=4; n = 189, 35.2%). ICU mortality rates were 2.4%, 10.6%, and 15.9% in these three groups, respectively. Post-ICU mortality was significantly greater in the clinical delirium vs. no delirium groups (hazard ratio = 1.67) after adjusting for age, APACHE II score, and medication-induced coma. Relative ICU length of stay was: no delirium < subsyndromal delirium < clinical delirium and hospital LOS: no delirium < subsyndromal delirium approximately clinical delirium. Patients with no delirium were more likely to be discharged home and less likely to need convalescence or long-term care than those with subsyndromal delirium or clinical delirium. ICDSC score increments higher than 4/8 were not associated with a change in mortality or LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical delirium is common, important and adverse in the critically ill. A graded diagnostic scale permits detection of a category of subsyndromal delirium which occurs in many ICU patients, and which is associated with adverse outcome.
OBJECTIVE:ICU delirium is common and adverse. The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score ranges from 0 to 8, with a score of 4 or higher indicating clinical delirium. We investigated whether lower (subsyndromal) values affect outcome. PATIENTS: 600 patients were evaluated with the ICDSC every 8[Symbol: see text]h. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of 558 assessed patients 537 noncomatose patients were divided into three groups: no delirium (score = 0; n = 169, 31.5%), subsyndromal delirium (score = 1-3; n = 179, 33.3%), and clinical delirium (score >or=4; n = 189, 35.2%). ICU mortality rates were 2.4%, 10.6%, and 15.9% in these three groups, respectively. Post-ICU mortality was significantly greater in the clinical delirium vs. no delirium groups (hazard ratio = 1.67) after adjusting for age, APACHE II score, and medication-induced coma. Relative ICU length of stay was: no delirium < subsyndromal delirium < clinical delirium and hospital LOS: no delirium < subsyndromal delirium approximately clinical delirium. Patients with no delirium were more likely to be discharged home and less likely to need convalescence or long-term care than those with subsyndromal delirium or clinical delirium. ICDSC score increments higher than 4/8 were not associated with a change in mortality or LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical delirium is common, important and adverse in the critically ill. A graded diagnostic scale permits detection of a category of subsyndromal delirium which occurs in many ICU patients, and which is associated with adverse outcome.
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Wesley Ely; Ayumi Shintani; Brenda Truman; Theodore Speroff; Sharon M Gordon; Frank E Harrell; Sharon K Inouye; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Wesley Ely; Brenda Truman; Ayumi Shintani; Jason W W Thomason; Arthur P Wheeler; Sharon Gordon; Joseph Francis; Theodore Speroff; Shiva Gautam; Richard Margolin; Curtis N Sessler; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Babar A Khan; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Siu L Hui; Noll L Campbell; Mark O Farber; Linda L Chlan; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Rina P Patel; Meredith Gambrell; Theodore Speroff; Theresa A Scott; Brenda T Pun; Joyce Okahashi; Cayce Strength; Pratik Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Hayley Burgess; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nada S Al-Qadheeb; Ethan M Balk; Gilles L Fraser; Yoanna Skrobik; Richard R Riker; John P Kress; Shawn Whitehead; John W Devlin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: A Morandi; P Pandharipande; M Trabucchi; R Rozzini; G Mistraletti; A C Trompeo; C Gregoretti; L Gattinoni; M V Ranieri; L Brochard; D Annane; C Putensen; U Guenther; P Fuentes; E Tobar; A R Anzueto; A Esteban; Y Skrobik; J I F Salluh; M Soares; C Granja; A Stubhaug; S E de Rooij; E Wesley Ely Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Mayur B Patel; Josef Bednarik; Patricia Lee; Yahya Shehabi; Jorge I Salluh; Arjen J Slooter; Kate E Klein; Yoanna Skrobik; Alessandro Morandi; Peter E Spronk; Andrew M Naidech; Brenda T Pun; Fernando A Bozza; Annachiara Marra; Sayona John; Pratik P Pandharipande; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 7.598