Literature DB >> 17404461

Registration of DRRs and portal images for verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy: a feasibility study in lung cancer treatment.

Thomas Künzler1, Jozef Grezdo, Joachim Bogner, Wolfgang Birkfellner, Dietmar Georg.   

Abstract

Image guidance has become a pre-requisite for hypofractionated radiotherapy where the applied dose per fraction is increased. Particularly in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours, one has to account for set-up errors and intrafraction tumour motion. In our feasibility study, we compared digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of lung lesions with MV portal images (PIs) to obtain the displacement of the tumour before irradiation. The verification of the tumour position was performed by rigid intensity based registration and three different merit functions such as the sum of squared pixel intensity differences, normalized cross correlation and normalized mutual information. The registration process then provided a translation vector that defines the displacement of the target in order to align the tumour with the isocentre. To evaluate the registration algorithms, 163 test images were created and subsequently, a lung phantom containing an 8 cm(3) tumour was built. In a further step, the registration process was applied on patient data, containing 38 tumours in 113 fractions. To potentially improve registration outcome, two filter types (histogram equalization and display equalization) were applied and their impact on the registration process was evaluated. Generated test images showed an increase in successful registrations when applying a histogram equalization filter whereas the lung phantom study proved the accuracy of the selected algorithms, i.e. deviations of the calculated translation vector for all test algorithms were below 1 mm. For clinical patient data, successful registrations occurred in about 59% of anterior-posterior (AP) and 46% of lateral projections, respectively. When patients with a clinical target volume smaller than 10 cm(3) were excluded, successful registrations go up to 90% in AP and 50% in lateral projection. In addition, a reliable identification of the tumour position was found to be difficult for clinical target volumes at the periphery of the lung, close to backbone or diaphragm. Moreover, tumour movement during shallow breathing strongly influences image acquisition for patient positioning. Recapitulating, 2D/3D image registration for lung tumours is an attractive alternative compared to conventional CT verification of the tumour position. Nevertheless, size and location of the tumour are limiting parameters for an accurate registration process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404461     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Patient setup verification procedure for a portal image in a computed radiography system with a high-resolution liquid-crystal display monitor.

Authors:  Hideki Fujita; Michihiro Yamaguchi; Yuichi Bessho; Tomio Fujioka; Haruyuki Fukuda; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-11-20

2.  Effect of daily setup errors on individual dose distribution in conventional radiotherapy: an initial study.

Authors:  Akihiro Takemura; Saori Shoji; Sinichi Ueda; Yuichi Kurata; Tomoyasu Kumano; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Masayuki Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

3.  DRR and portal image registration for automatic patient positioning in radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Ma Consuelo Bastida-Jumilla; Jorge Larrey-Ruiz; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Juan Morales-Sánchez; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Evaluation of whole-body MR to CT deformable image registration.

Authors:  A Akbarzadeh; D Gutierrez; A Baskin; M R Ay; A Ahmadian; N Riahi Alam; K O Lövblad; H Zaidi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  High-performance GPU-based rendering for real-time, rigid 2D/3D-image registration and motion prediction in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Jakob Spoerk; Christelle Gendrin; Christoph Weber; Michael Figl; Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro; Hugo Furtado; Daniella Fabri; Christoph Bloch; Helmar Bergmann; Eduard Gröller; Wolfgang Birkfellner
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.820

6.  A comparative study on manual and automatic slice-to-volume registration of CT images.

Authors:  Laura Frühwald; Joachim Kettenbach; Michael Figl; Johann Hummel; Helmar Bergmann; Wolfgang Birkfellner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Stochastic rank correlation: a robust merit function for 2D/3D registration of image data obtained at different energies.

Authors:  Wolfgang Birkfellner; Markus Stock; Michael Figl; Christelle Gendrin; Johann Hummel; Shuo Dong; Joachim Kettenbach; Dietmar Georg; Helmar Bergmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Validation for 2D/3D registration. I: A new gold standard data set.

Authors:  S A Pawiro; P Markelj; F Pernus; C Gendrin; M Figl; C Weber; F Kainberger; I Nöbauer-Huhmann; H Bergmeister; M Stock; D Georg; H Bergmann; W Birkfellner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Feasibility study on effect and stability of adaptive radiotherapy on kilovoltage cone beam CT.

Authors:  Poonam Yadav; Velayudham Ramasubramanian; Bhudatt R Paliwal
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Monitoring tumor motion by real time 2D/3D registration during radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christelle Gendrin; Hugo Furtado; Christoph Weber; Christoph Bloch; Michael Figl; Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro; Helmar Bergmann; Markus Stock; Gabor Fichtinger; Dietmar Georg; Wolfgang Birkfellner
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 6.280

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.