CONTEXT: Psychosocial interventions have been shown to enhance pharmacotherapy outcomes in bipolar disorder. OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefits of 4 disorder-specific psychotherapies in conjunction with pharmacotherapy on time to recovery and the likelihood of remaining well after an episode of bipolar depression. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Fifteen clinics affiliated with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder. Patients A total of 293 referred outpatients with bipolar I or II disorder and depression treated with protocol pharmacotherapy were randomly assigned to intensive psychotherapy (n = 163) or collaborative care (n = 130), a brief psychoeducational intervention. INTERVENTIONS:Intensive psychotherapy was given weekly and biweekly for up to 30 sessions in 9 months according to protocols for family-focused therapy, interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, and cognitive behavior therapy. Collaborative care consisted of 3 sessions in 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome assessments were performed by psychiatrists at each pharmacotherapy visit. Primary outcomes included time to recovery and the proportion of patients classified as well during each of 12 study months. RESULTS: All analyses were by intention to treat. Rates of attrition did not differ across the intensive psychotherapy (35.6%) and collaborative care (30.8%) conditions. Patients receiving intensive psychotherapy had significantly higher year-end recovery rates (64.4% vs 51.5%) and shorter times to recovery than patients in collaborative care (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.00; P = .01). Patients in intensive psychotherapy were 1.58 times (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.13) more likely to be clinically well during any study month than those in collaborative care (P = .003). No statistically significant differences were observed in the outcomes of the 3 intensive psychotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive psychosocial treatment as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy was more beneficial than brief treatment in enhancing stabilization from bipolar depression. Future studies should compare the cost-effectiveness of models of psychotherapy for bipolar disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00012558.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Psychosocial interventions have been shown to enhance pharmacotherapy outcomes in bipolar disorder. OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefits of 4 disorder-specific psychotherapies in conjunction with pharmacotherapy on time to recovery and the likelihood of remaining well after an episode of bipolar depression. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Fifteen clinics affiliated with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder. Patients A total of 293 referred outpatients with bipolar I or II disorder and depression treated with protocol pharmacotherapy were randomly assigned to intensive psychotherapy (n = 163) or collaborative care (n = 130), a brief psychoeducational intervention. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive psychotherapy was given weekly and biweekly for up to 30 sessions in 9 months according to protocols for family-focused therapy, interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, and cognitive behavior therapy. Collaborative care consisted of 3 sessions in 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome assessments were performed by psychiatrists at each pharmacotherapy visit. Primary outcomes included time to recovery and the proportion of patients classified as well during each of 12 study months. RESULTS: All analyses were by intention to treat. Rates of attrition did not differ across the intensive psychotherapy (35.6%) and collaborative care (30.8%) conditions. Patients receiving intensive psychotherapy had significantly higher year-end recovery rates (64.4% vs 51.5%) and shorter times to recovery than patients in collaborative care (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.00; P = .01). Patients in intensive psychotherapy were 1.58 times (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.13) more likely to be clinically well during any study month than those in collaborative care (P = .003). No statistically significant differences were observed in the outcomes of the 3 intensive psychotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive psychosocial treatment as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy was more beneficial than brief treatment in enhancing stabilization from bipolar depression. Future studies should compare the cost-effectiveness of models of psychotherapy for bipolar disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00012558.
Authors: Lewis L Judd; Hagop S Akiskal; Pamela J Schettler; William Coryell; Jean Endicott; Jack D Maser; David A Solomon; Andrew C Leon; Martin B Keller Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-03
Authors: Lewis L Judd; Hagop S Akiskal; Pamela J Schettler; Jean Endicott; Jack Maser; David A Solomon; Andrew C Leon; John A Rice; Martin B Keller Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2002-06
Authors: Dominic H Lam; Edward R Watkins; Peter Hayward; Jenifer Bright; Kim Wright; Natalie Kerr; Gina Parr-Davis; Pak Sham Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-02
Authors: Gary S Sachs; Michael E Thase; Michael W Otto; Mark Bauer; David Miklowitz; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip Lavori; Barry Lebowitz; Mathew Rudorfer; Ellen Frank; Andrew A Nierenberg; Maurizio Fava; Charles Bowden; Terence Ketter; Lauren Marangell; Joseph Calabrese; David Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Francesco Colom; Eduard Vieta; Anabel Martinez-Aran; Maria Reinares; Jose Manuel Goikolea; Antonio Benabarre; Carla Torrent; Merce Comes; Barbara Corbella; Gemma Parramon; Josep Corominas Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-04
Authors: David J Miklowitz; Christopher D Schneck; Patricia D Walshaw; Amy S Garrett; Manpreet K Singh; Catherine A Sugar; Kiki D Chang Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Thilo Deckersbach; Britta K Hölzel; Lori R Eisner; Jonathan P Stange; Andrew D Peckham; Darin D Dougherty; Scott L Rauch; Sara Lazar; Andrew A Nierenberg Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 5.243
Authors: Harold D Green; Joan S Tucker; Suzanne L Wenzel; Daniela Golinelli; David P Kennedy; Gery W Ryan; Annie J Zhou Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2012-01-20
Authors: Deborah A Perlick; David J Miklowitz; Norma Lopez; James Chou; Carla Kalvin; Victoria Adzhiashvili; Andrew Aronson Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: David J Miklowitz; Elizabeth L George; David A Axelson; Eunice Y Kim; Boris Birmaher; Christopher Schneck; Carol Beresford; W Edward Craighead; David A Brent Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Ellen Frank; Meredith L Wallace; Martica Hall; Brant Hasler; Jessica C Levenson; Carol A Janney; Isabella Soreca; Matthew C Fleming; Joan Buttenfield; Fiona C Ritchey; David J Kupfer Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 6.744