Literature DB >> 17404101

Accelerated preclinical testing using transplanted tumors from genetically engineered mouse breast cancer models.

Lyuba Varticovski1, Melinda G Hollingshead, Ana I Robles, Xiaolin Wu, James Cherry, David J Munroe, Luanne Lukes, Miriam R Anver, John P Carter, Suzanne D Borgel, Howard Stotler, Carrie A Bonomi, Nomelí P Nunez, Stephen D Hursting, Wenhui Qiao, Chuxia X Deng, Jeff E Green, Kent W Hunter, Glenn Merlino, Patricia S Steeg, Lalage M Wakefield, J Carl Barrett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models for preclinical testing of anticancer therapies is hampered by variable tumor latency, incomplete penetrance, and complicated breeding schemes. Here, we describe and validate a transplantation strategy that circumvents some of these difficulties. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Tumor fragments from tumor-bearing MMTV-PyMT or cell suspensions from MMTV-PyMT, -Her2/neu, -wnt1, -wnt1/p53(+/-), BRCA1/p53(+/-), and C3(1)T-Ag mice were transplanted into the mammary fat pad or s.c. into naïve syngeneic or immunosuppressed mice. Tumor development was monitored and tissues were processed for histopathology and gene expression profiling. Metastasis was scored 60 days after the removal of transplanted tumors.
RESULTS: PyMT tumor fragments and cell suspensions from anterior glands grew faster than posterior tumors in serial passages regardless of the site of implantation. Microarray analysis revealed genetic differences between these tumors. The transplantation was reproducible using anterior tumors from multiple GEM, and tumor growth rate correlated with the number of transplanted cells. Similar morphologic appearances were observed in original and transplanted tumors. Metastasis developed in >90% of mice transplanted with PyMT, 40% with BRCA1/p53(+/-) and wnt1/p53(+/-), and 15% with Her2/neu tumors. Expansion of PyMT and wnt1 tumors by serial transplantation for two passages did not lead to significant changes in gene expression. PyMT-transplanted tumors and anterior tumors of transgenic mice showed similar sensitivities to cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel.
CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of GEM tumors can provide a large cohort of mice bearing mammary tumors at the same stage of tumor development and with defined frequency of metastasis in a well-characterized molecular and genetic background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404101     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

1.  The tumour suppressor C/EBPδ inhibits FBXW7 expression and promotes mammary tumour metastasis.

Authors:  Kuppusamy Balamurugan; Ju-Ming Wang; Hsin-Hwa Tsai; Shikha Sharan; Miriam Anver; Robert Leighty; Esta Sterneck
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Non-germline genetically engineered mouse models for translational cancer research.

Authors:  Joerg Heyer; Lawrence N Kwong; Scott W Lowe; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  P53 genotype as a determinant of ER expression and tamoxifen response in the MMTV-Wnt-1 model of mammary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Robin Fuchs-Young; Stephanie H Shirley; Isabel Lambertz; Jennifer K L Colby; Jie Tian; Dennis Johnston; Irma B Gimenez-Conti; Lawrence A Donehower; Claudio J Conti; Stephen D Hursting
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Haploinsufficiency in the prometastasis Kiss1 receptor Gpr54 delays breast tumor initiation, progression, and lung metastasis.

Authors:  Sung-Gook Cho; Ying Wang; Melissa Rodriguez; Kunrong Tan; Wenzheng Zhang; Jian Luo; Dali Li; Mingyao Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Genomic analyses as a guide to target identification and preclinical testing of mouse models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Christina N Bennett; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research.

Authors:  P Workman; E O Aboagye; F Balkwill; A Balmain; G Bruder; D J Chaplin; J A Double; J Everitt; D A H Farningham; M J Glennie; L R Kelland; V Robinson; I J Stratford; G M Tozer; S Watson; S R Wedge; S A Eccles
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Molecular characterisation of side population cells with cancer stem cell-like characteristics in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C D Salcido; A Larochelle; B J Taylor; C E Dunbar; L Varticovski
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Positional variations in mammary gland development and cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Veltmaat; Ann F Ramsdell; Esta Sterneck
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Development of novel tumor-targeted theranostic nanoparticles activated by membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases for combined cancer magnetic resonance imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Celina Ansari; Grigory A Tikhomirov; Su Hyun Hong; Robert A Falconer; Paul M Loadman; Jason H Gill; Rosalinda Castaneda; Florette K Hazard; Ling Tong; Olga D Lenkov; Dean W Felsher; Jianghong Rao; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Small       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 10.  Unlocking the power of cross-species genomic analyses: identification of evolutionarily conserved breast cancer networks and validation of preclinical models.

Authors:  Christina N Bennett; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.