OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review of published literature was to identify the number and focus of empirically based papers that included research methods used to directly solicit patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from pediatric oncology patients at end of life. METHODS: Key terms including "pediatric or child and oncology or cancer and end of life or palliative or hospice or dying" were used with five data bases (PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, PsycInfo & PsycArticles, and CINAHL) for English language literature published between January, 2001 and June, 2006. All retrieved documents were independently reviewed by a panel of six (nurses, physicians, and one psychologist) with backgrounds in pediatric oncology. RESULTS: Thirty-five publications were identified but nine (25.7%) were eliminated from the analysis as they did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 26, four (15.4%) included patient-reported outcomes, six (23.1%) included parent only-reported outcomes, and five (19.2%) included staff only-reported outcomes. Nine (34.6%) were retrospective medical record reviews. Two (7.7%) included parent and record review data or parent and physician reports. CONCLUSIONS: Empirically-based end-of-life publications in pediatric oncology are relatively few in number and nearly 85% of completed studies do not include PRO.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review of published literature was to identify the number and focus of empirically based papers that included research methods used to directly solicit patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from pediatric oncology patients at end of life. METHODS: Key terms including "pediatric or child and oncology or cancer and end of life or palliative or hospice or dying" were used with five data bases (PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, PsycInfo & PsycArticles, and CINAHL) for English language literature published between January, 2001 and June, 2006. All retrieved documents were independently reviewed by a panel of six (nurses, physicians, and one psychologist) with backgrounds in pediatric oncology. RESULTS: Thirty-five publications were identified but nine (25.7%) were eliminated from the analysis as they did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 26, four (15.4%) included patient-reported outcomes, six (23.1%) included parent only-reported outcomes, and five (19.2%) included staff only-reported outcomes. Nine (34.6%) were retrospective medical record reviews. Two (7.7%) included parent and record review data or parent and physician reports. CONCLUSIONS: Empirically-based end-of-life publications in pediatric oncology are relatively few in number and nearly 85% of completed studies do not include PRO.
Authors: Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Katherine P Kelly; Lori Wiener; Robert L Casey; Cynthia J Bell; Joanne Wolfe; Amy M Garee; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Cynthia J Bell; Lori Wiener; Amy M Garee; Katherine P Kelly; Robert L Casey; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Lois Van Cleve; Cynthia E Muñoz; Marilyn Savedra; Matt Riggs; Elizabeth Bossert; Marcia Grant; Kathleen Adlard Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Viswatej Avutu; Kathleen A Lynch; Marie E Barnett; Jacqueline A Vera; Julia L Glade Bender; William D Tap; Thomas M Atkinson Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Terrah Foster Akard; Mary Jo Gilmer; Debra L Friedman; Barbara Given; Verna L Hendricks-Ferguson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 1.636