Literature DB >> 17403402

Trends in state/population-based Down syndrome screening and invasive prenatal testing with the introduction of first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening, South Australia, 1995-2005.

Peter R Muller1, Robert Cocciolone, Eric A Haan, Chris Wilkinson, Heather Scott, Leonie Sage, Renata Bird, Rhonda Hutchinson, Annabelle Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review trends in the us of maternal serum Down syndrome screening and invasive prenatal testing before and after the introduction of a state-based first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening program. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective population-based study was performed on first- and second-trimester Down syndrome screening, invasive prenatal testing, and prenatal detection of Down syndrome from 1995 to 2005 in South Australia with data from state-based registers. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate trends.
RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the use of second-trimester Down syndrome maternal serum screening (from 75% in 1995 to 25% in 2005; P < .001) and a corresponding significant increase in first-trimester combined screening (from 0.8% in 2000 to 49% in 2005; P < .001). The proportion of all confinements that involved invasive prenatal testing fell (from 9.3% in 1995 to 7.6% in 2005; P < .001). There was a significant decrease in the number of invasive prenatal tests that were needed to detect 1 Down syndrome fetus (from 86 tests in 1995 to 40 tests in 2005; P < .001), with no significant change in the proportion of Down syndrome cases that were detected prenatally.
CONCLUSION: The introduction and increased use of first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening has been associated with more efficient use of invasive prenatal testing in South Australia and has maintained a high level of overall prenatal detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403402     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  2 in total

1.  Prenatal Invasive Testing at a Tertiary Referral Center in India: A Report of 433 Cases Under a Single Operator.

Authors:  Vandana Bansal; Rujul Jhaveri
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-06-08

2.  Older mothers and increased impact of prenatal screening: stable livebirth prevalence of trisomy 21 in the Netherlands for the period 2000-2013.

Authors:  Maurike D de Groot-van der Mooren; Saskia Tamminga; Dick Oepkes; Michel E Weijerman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.