Literature DB >> 17403398

Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review.

Agustin Conde-Agudelo1, Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez, Ana C Kafury-Goeta.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to explore the association between birth spacing and risk of adverse maternal outcomes. The study was a systematic review of observational studies that examined the relationship between interpregnancy or birth intervals and adverse maternal outcomes. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, long interpregnancy intervals, possibly longer than 5 years, are independently associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. There is emerging evidence that women with long interpregnancy intervals are at increased risk for labor dystocia and that short intervals are associated with increased risks of uterine rupture in women attempting a vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery and uteroplacental bleeding disorders (placental abruption and placenta previa). Less clear is the association between short intervals and other adverse outcomes such as maternal death and anemia. Long interpregnancy intervals are independently associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Both short and long interpregnancy intervals seem to be related to other adverse maternal outcomes, but more research is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403398     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  121 in total

1.  Socioeconomic Position and Reproduction: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

Authors:  N Holowko; M Jones; L Tooth; I Koupil; G D Mishra
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-12

2.  Initiation of postpartum contraception: a survey among health centre physicians and nurses in Finland.

Authors:  Tuire Sannisto; Elise Kosunen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Postpartum contraceptive use among women with a recent preterm birth.

Authors:  Cheryl L Robbins; Sherry L Farr; Lauren B Zapata; Denise V D'Angelo; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Mobile Technology for Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Lisa Dulli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Determinants of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Mulu Abraha Woldegiorgis; Janet Hiller; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Denny Meyer; Jahar Bhowmik
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval among women treated with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S Amrane; M B Brown; R A Lobo; B Luke
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The marginal valuation of fertility.

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Rebecca Bliege Bird
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.178

8.  Interpregnancy Interval and Childbirth Outcomes in California, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Flojaune Griffin Cofer; Moshe Fridman; Elizabeth Lawton; Lisa M Korst; Lisa Nicholas; Kimberly D Gregory
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

9.  Quality of systematic reviews of observational nontherapeutic studies.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane; Stacy Jansen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland.

Authors:  Eleanor R Love; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Norman C Smith; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.