N Holowko1, M Jones2, L Tooth2, I Koupil3,4, G D Mishra2. 1. Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Level 2, Public Health Building (887), Corner of Herston Rd and Wyndham St, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. natalie.holowko@uq.net.au. 2. Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Level 2, Public Health Building (887), Corner of Herston Rd and Wyndham St, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. 3. Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet, Sveavägen 160, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of socioeconomic position (SEP) with reproductive outcomes among Australian women. METHODS: Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health's (population-based cohort study) 1973-1978 cohort were used (N = 6899, aged 37-42 years in 2015). The association of SEP (childhood and own, multiple indicators) with age at first birth, birth-to-pregnancy (BTP) intervals and total number of children was analysed using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: 14% of women had their first birth aged < 24 years. 29% of multiparous women had a BTP interval within the WHO recommendation (18-27 months). Women with a low SEP had increased odds of a first birth < 24 years: low (OR 7.0: 95% C.I. 5.3, 9.3) or intermediate education (OR 3.8: 2.8, 5.1); living in rural (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or remote (OR 2.1: 1.7, 2.7) areas; who found it sometimes (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or always difficult (OR 2.0: 1.6, 2.7) to manage on their income; and did not know their parent's education (OR 4.5: 3.2, 6.4). Low SEP was associated with having a much longer than recommended BTP interval. CONCLUSION: As the first Australian study describing social differences in reproductive characteristics, these findings provide a base for reducing social inequalities in reproduction. Assisting adequate BTP spacing is important, particularly for women with existing elevated risks due to social disadvantage; including having a first birth < 24 years of age and a longer than recommended BTP interval. This includes reviewing services/access to postnatal support, free family planning/contraception clinics, and improved family policies.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of socioeconomic position (SEP) with reproductive outcomes among Australian women. METHODS: Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health's (population-based cohort study) 1973-1978 cohort were used (N = 6899, aged 37-42 years in 2015). The association of SEP (childhood and own, multiple indicators) with age at first birth, birth-to-pregnancy (BTP) intervals and total number of children was analysed using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: 14% of women had their first birth aged < 24 years. 29% of multiparous women had a BTP interval within the WHO recommendation (18-27 months). Women with a low SEP had increased odds of a first birth < 24 years: low (OR 7.0: 95% C.I. 5.3, 9.3) or intermediate education (OR 3.8: 2.8, 5.1); living in rural (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or remote (OR 2.1: 1.7, 2.7) areas; who found it sometimes (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or always difficult (OR 2.0: 1.6, 2.7) to manage on their income; and did not know their parent's education (OR 4.5: 3.2, 6.4). Low SEP was associated with having a much longer than recommended BTP interval. CONCLUSION: As the first Australian study describing social differences in reproductive characteristics, these findings provide a base for reducing social inequalities in reproduction. Assisting adequate BTP spacing is important, particularly for women with existing elevated risks due to social disadvantage; including having a first birth < 24 years of age and a longer than recommended BTP interval. This includes reviewing services/access to postnatal support, free family planning/contraception clinics, and improved family policies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Age at first birth; Birth intervals; Birth-to-pregnancy interval; Educational status; Reproduction; Socioeconomic position
Authors: Frederike J de Weger; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Jan Serroyen; Egbert R te Velde; Luc J M Smits Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Rachel Gold; Frederick A Connell; Patrick Heagerty; Peter Cummings; Stephen Bezruchka; Robert Davis; Mary Lawrence Cawthon Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2005-09