Literature DB >> 1740261

Factors influencing hospital patients' preferences in the utilization of life-sustaining treatments.

J Cohen-Mansfield1, J A Droge, N Billig.   

Abstract

Ninety-seven elderly hospitalized patients were asked about their preferences for several treatments under three hypothetical levels of future cognitive functioning: intact, confused, and unconscious. Levels of cognitive functioning and depression were also assessed. Sixty-six percent of the patients were more likely to want treatment if they expected to be cognitively intact than when a future condition involved impaired cognition; 36% did not want any treatment in at least 75% of the conditions; and 16% wanted treatment in at least 75% of the conditions studied. A minority (12%) did not show any pattern in their preferences. The absence of a definite pattern was related to lower levels of education and to higher levels of depressive symptoms. Patients self-reported their preferences for treatments being influenced most by their personal values, religion, and by experiences with illnesses of others.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Georgetown University Hospital; Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1740261     DOI: 10.1093/geront/32.1.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  11 in total

1.  Three methods of assessing values for advance care planning: comparing persons with and without dementia.

Authors:  Michele J Karel; Jennifer Moye; Adam Bank; Armin R Azar
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2007-02

2.  Tube feeding preferences among nursing home residents.

Authors:  L A O'Brien; E A Siegert; J A Grisso; G M Maislin; K LaPann; L K Evans; K P Krotki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The quality of care provided to hospitalized patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Anne M Walling; Steven M Asch; Karl A Lorenz; Carol P Roth; Tod Barry; Katherine L Kahn; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-28

4.  Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation.

Authors:  Silvia Sörensen; Rachel L Missell; Alexander Eustice-Corwin; Dorine A Otieno
Journal:  J Elder Policy       Date:  2021

5.  Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.

Authors:  R S Schonwetter; R M Walker; D R Kramer; B E Robinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Religion, risk, and medical decision making at the end of life.

Authors:  Peter H Van Ness; Virginia R Towle; John R O'Leary; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2008-04-28

7.  Preferences for life-prolonging medical treatments and deference to the will of god.

Authors:  Laraine Winter; Marie P Dennis; Barbara Parker
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2008-08-20

8.  Decisional conflict among patients who accept or decline participation in phase I oncology studies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Caroline B Burnett; Kevin A Schulman; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 9.  Prognostic factors for morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing acute gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip Davis; Jill Hayden; Jeremy Springer; Jonathon Bailey; Michele Molinari; Paul Johnson
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Reasoning in the capacity to make medical decisions: the consideration of values.

Authors:  Michele J Karel; Ronald J Gurrera; Bret Hicken; Jennifer Moye
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.