Peter H Van Ness1, Virginia R Towle, John R O'Leary, Terri R Fried. 1. Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Program On Aging, and Yale School of Public Health, 300 George Street, Suite 775, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. peter.vanness@yale.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to present empirical evidence about whether religious patients are more or less willing to undergo the risks associated with potentially life-sustaining treatment. METHODS: At least every 4 months 226 older community-dwelling persons with advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were asked questions about several dimensions of religiousness and about their willingness to accept potentially life-sustaining treatment. RESULTS: Results were mixed but persons who said that during their illness they grew closer to God (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.15, 2.78) or those grew spiritually (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.03, 2.52) were more willing to accept risk associated with potentially life-sustaining treatment than were persons who did not report such growth. DISCUSSION: Not all dimensions of religiousness have the same association with willingness to undergo potentially life-sustaining treatment. Seriously ill older, religious patients are not especially predisposed to avoid risk and resist treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to present empirical evidence about whether religious patients are more or less willing to undergo the risks associated with potentially life-sustaining treatment. METHODS: At least every 4 months 226 older community-dwelling persons with advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were asked questions about several dimensions of religiousness and about their willingness to accept potentially life-sustaining treatment. RESULTS: Results were mixed but persons who said that during their illness they grew closer to God (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.15, 2.78) or those grew spiritually (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.03, 2.52) were more willing to accept risk associated with potentially life-sustaining treatment than were persons who did not report such growth. DISCUSSION: Not all dimensions of religiousness have the same association with willingness to undergo potentially life-sustaining treatment. Seriously ill older, religious patients are not especially predisposed to avoid risk and resist treatment.
Authors: Terri R Fried; Amy L Byers; William T Gallo; Peter H Van Ness; Virginia R Towle; John R O'Leary; Joel A Dubin Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-04-24
Authors: Tracy A Balboni; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Susan D Block; M Elizabeth Paulk; Christopher S Lathan; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Terri R Fried; Peter H Van Ness; Amy L Byers; Virginia R Towle; John R O'Leary; Joel A Dubin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: George Kypriotakis; Linda E Francis; Elizabeth O'Toole; Tanyanika Phillips Towe; Julia Hannum Rose Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrea C Phelps; Paul K Maciejewski; Matthew Nilsson; Tracy A Balboni; Alexi A Wright; M Elizabeth Paulk; Elizabeth Trice; Deborah Schrag; John R Peteet; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alejandro Gutierrez-Castillo; Javier Gutierrez-Castillo; Francisco Guadarrama-Conzuelo; Amado Jimenez-Ruiz; Jose Luis Ruiz-Sandoval Journal: J Med Ethics Hist Med Date: 2020-12-12