Literature DB >> 17401541

The isolation and initial characterization of mercury resistant chemolithotrophic thermophilic bacteria from mercury rich geothermal springs.

Aspassia D Chatziefthimiou1, Melitza Crespo-Medina, Yanping Wang, Costantino Vetriani, Tamar Barkay.   

Abstract

Mercury rich geothermal springs are likely environments where mercury resistance is critical to microbial life and where microbe-mercury interactions may have evolved. Eleven facultative thermophilic and chemolithoautotrophic, thiosulfate oxidizing bacteria were isolated from thiosulfate enrichments of biofilms from mercury rich hot sulfidic springs in Mount Amiata, Italy. Some strains were highly resistant to mercury (>or=200 muM HgCl(2)) regardless of its presence or absence during primary enrichments, and three reduced ionic mercury to its elemental form. The gene encoding for the mercuric reductase enzyme (MerA), was amplified by PCR from seven strains. However, one highly resistant strain did not reduce mercury nor carried merA, suggesting an alternative resistance mechanism. All strains were members of the order Bacillales and were most closely related to previously described thermophiles belonging to the Firmicutes. Phylogenetic analyses clustered the MerA of the isolates in two supported novel nodes within the Firmicutes lineage and a comparison with the 16S rRNA gene tree suggested at least one case of horizontal gene transfer. Overall, the results show that the thermophilic thiosulfate oxidizing isolates were adapted to life in presence of mercury mostly, but not exclusively, by possessing MerA. These findings suggest that reduction of mercury by chemolithotrophic thermophilic bacteria may mobilize mercury from sulfur and iron deposits in geothermal environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17401541     DOI: 10.1007/s00792-007-0065-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Extremophiles        ISSN: 1431-0651            Impact factor:   3.035


  36 in total

Review 1.  Microbial heavy-metal resistance.

Authors:  D H Nies
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems.

Authors:  Tamar Barkay; Susan M Miller; Anne O Summers
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 3.  Microbial transformations of mercury: potentials, challenges, and achievements in controlling mercury toxicity in the environment.

Authors:  Tamar Barkay; Irene Wagner-Döbler
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.086

Review 4.  Extracellular polymeric substances mediate bioleaching/biocorrosion via interfacial processes involving iron(III) ions and acidophilic bacteria.

Authors:  Wolfgang Sand; Tilman Gehrke
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  Luminescence facilitated detection of bioavailable mercury in natural waters.

Authors:  T Barkay; R R Turner; L D Rasmussen; C A Kelly; J W Rudd
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1998

6.  Simplified X-ray film method for detection of bacterial volatilization of mercury chloride by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  K Nakamura; H Nakahara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Community analysis of a mercury hot spring supports occurrence of domain-specific forms of mercuric reductase.

Authors:  Jessica Simbahan; Elizabeth Kurth; James Schelert; Amanda Dillman; Etsuko Moriyama; Stevan Jovanovich; Paul Blum
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Identification of extracellular enzyme producing thermophilic bacilli from Balcova (Agamemnon) geothermal site by ITS rDNA RFLP.

Authors:  E Yavuz; H Gunes; S Harsa; A F Yenidunya
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Anoxybacillus contaminans sp. nov. and Bacillus gelatini sp. nov., isolated from contaminated gelatin batches.

Authors:  Elke De Clerck; Marina Rodríguez-Díaz; Tom Vanhoutte; Jeroen Heyrman; Niall A Logan; Paul De Vos
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 10.  The three modern faces of mercury.

Authors:  Thomas W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mercury resistance and mercuric reductase activities and expression among chemotrophic thermophilic Aquificae.

Authors:  Zachary Freedman; Chengsheng Zhu; Tamar Barkay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Metal-tolerant thermophiles: metals as electron donors and acceptors, toxicity, tolerance and industrial applications.

Authors:  Preeti Ranawat; Seema Rawat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Genome-Resolved Metagenomics and Detailed Geochemical Speciation Analyses Yield New Insights into Microbial Mercury Cycling in Geothermal Springs.

Authors:  Caitlin M Gionfriddo; Matthew B Stott; Jean F Power; Jacob M Ogorek; David P Krabbenhoft; Ryan Wick; Kathryn Holt; Lin-Xing Chen; Brian C Thomas; Jillian F Banfield; John W Moreau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Survival of the fittest: overcoming oxidative stress at the extremes of Acid, heat and metal.

Authors:  Yukari Maezato; Paul Blum
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2012-08-23

5.  Comparison of Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity in Traditional Gold Mining Waste Disposal Site and Rice Field by Using a Metabarcoding Approach.

Authors:  Billy Johnson Kepel; Maria Apriliani Gani; Trina Ekawati Tallei
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-07

Review 6.  Extreme Environments and High-Level Bacterial Tellurite Resistance.

Authors:  Chris Maltman; Vladimir Yurkov
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-11-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.