UNLABELLED: The gastrin/cholecystokinin-2 (CCK-2) receptor has been identified as a possible target for peptide receptor radionuclide imaging and therapy. Several radiolabeled peptides binding to this receptor have been explored in animal models and clinical trials but either low tumor uptake or high renal retention has been found. The aim of this study was to identify a peptide with improved tumor-to-kidney pharmacodynamics when compared with current candidates. METHODS: A small peptide-chelator library of 34 compounds based on the C-terminal sequences of CCK-8 or minigastrin was constructed. The peptides were radiolabeled with (111)In with high labeling efficiency (>90%), as determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis. The labeled peptides were screened by assessing tumor and kidney uptake in pancreatic xenograft nude mouse models, including AR42J. An extensive biodistribution analysis was performed on the lead candidate from the library. RESULTS: Minigastrin analogs containing a pentaglutamate sequence showed the highest tumor uptake but very high renal retention. CCK analogs showed the lowest tumor and renal uptake. Deletion of the pentaglutamate sequence in the gastrin analogs lowered the tumor uptake by a factor of 3 but decreased the kidney uptake by a factor of 20. Insertion of histidine residues in the sequence reduced kidney uptake by a further factor of almost 2-fold. In AR42J tumor-bearing mice, the peptide with the sequence DOTA-HHEAYGWMDF-NH(2) (DOTA is tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid) showed the highest tumor-to-kidney ratio of all peptides studied, with saturable uptake in target organs and low uptake by nontarget tissues other than the kidney. CONCLUSION: This peptide is a worthwhile candidate for clinical studies to determine whether it is suitable for use in peptide receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy.
UNLABELLED: The gastrin/cholecystokinin-2 (CCK-2) receptor has been identified as a possible target for peptide receptor radionuclide imaging and therapy. Several radiolabeled peptides binding to this receptor have been explored in animal models and clinical trials but either low tumor uptake or high renal retention has been found. The aim of this study was to identify a peptide with improved tumor-to-kidney pharmacodynamics when compared with current candidates. METHODS: A small peptide-chelator library of 34 compounds based on the C-terminal sequences of CCK-8 or minigastrin was constructed. The peptides were radiolabeled with (111)In with high labeling efficiency (>90%), as determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis. The labeled peptides were screened by assessing tumor and kidney uptake in pancreatic xenograft nude mouse models, including AR42J. An extensive biodistribution analysis was performed on the lead candidate from the library. RESULTS: Minigastrin analogs containing a pentaglutamate sequence showed the highest tumor uptake but very high renal retention. CCK analogs showed the lowest tumor and renal uptake. Deletion of the pentaglutamate sequence in the gastrin analogs lowered the tumor uptake by a factor of 3 but decreased the kidney uptake by a factor of 20. Insertion of histidine residues in the sequence reduced kidney uptake by a further factor of almost 2-fold. In AR42J tumor-bearing mice, the peptide with the sequence DOTA-HHEAYGWMDF-NH(2) (DOTA is tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid) showed the highest tumor-to-kidney ratio of all peptides studied, with saturable uptake in target organs and low uptake by nontarget tissues other than the kidney. CONCLUSION: This peptide is a worthwhile candidate for clinical studies to determine whether it is suitable for use in peptide receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy.
Authors: Berthold A Nock; Theodosia Maina; Martin Béhé; Anastasia Nikolopoulou; Martin Gotthardt; Jörg S Schmitt; Thomas M Behr; Helmut R Mäcke Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jaap J M Teunissen; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Marion de Jong; Jan-Paul Esser; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.043
Authors: T M Behr; M Béhé; C Angerstein; S Gratz; R Mach; L Hagemann; N Jenner; M Stiehler; K Frank-Raue; F Raue; W Becker Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dik J Kwekkeboom; Jaap J Teunissen; Willem H Bakker; Peter P Kooij; Wouter W de Herder; Richard A Feelders; Casper H van Eijck; Jan-Paul Esser; Boen L Kam; Eric P Krenning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Christine Rangger; Jane Sosabowski; Peter Laverman; Jean-Claude Reubi; Irene Johanna Virgolini; Clemens Decristoforo Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Maarten Brom; Lieke Joosten; Peter Laverman; Wim J G Oyen; Martin Béhé; Martin Gotthardt; Otto C Boerman Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Luigi Aloj; Michela Aurilio; Valentina Rinaldi; Laura D'ambrosio; Diego Tesauro; Petra Kolenc Peitl; Theodosia Maina; Rosalba Mansi; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Lieke Joosten; Jane K Sosabowski; Wouter A P Breeman; Erik De Blois; Stuart Koelewijn; Marleen Melis; Beatrice Waser; Karin Beetschen; Jean Claude Reubi; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Marek Pruszynski; Eftychia Koumarianou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Hilde Revets; Nick Devoogdt; Tony Lahoutte; H Kim Lyerly; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marek Pruszynski; Eftychia Koumarianou; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Hilde Revets; Nick Devoogdt; Tony Lahoutte; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 2.408