BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for morbid obesity has been well established. We previously recommended 2-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for super-super obese patients. In the 2-stage version, these patients undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a first-stage procedure, followed by laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch as the second stage for more definitive treatment of their obesity. However, short-term weight regain may occur owing to gastric dilation after initial laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to prevent gastric dilation after sleeve gastrectomy. We designed a sleeve gastrectomy with wrapping using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh. METHODS: Eleven Yorkshire pigs weighing 20-25 kg underwent sleeve gastrectomy with wrapping using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh (wrapping group) or sleeve gastrectomy only (control group) to compare the weight loss. The animals were weighed weekly postoperatively. Necropsy was performed 8 weeks postoperatively to confirm the wrapping by pathologic report. RESULTS: Four pigs died because of staple line failure or strangulation; no perioperative complications occurred in the other pigs. The operative time for the control group was 198 +/- 60 minutes and for the wrapping group was 181 +/- 86 minutes (P = NS). The average weight of the removed stomach was 123.3 +/- 5.8 g in the control group and 140.3 +/- 69.9 g in the wrapping group (P = NS). The postoperative weight gain at 8 weeks was significantly slower in the wrapping group than in the control group (P <.0001). The pathologic necropsy report noted that the mesh was well attached to the stomach wall at 9 days postoperatively, with no unexpected deaths. CONCLUSION: Sleeve gastrectomy with wrapping using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh is feasible, and weight gain was reduced in the porcine model.
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for morbid obesity has been well established. We previously recommended 2-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for super-super obesepatients. In the 2-stage version, these patients undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a first-stage procedure, followed by laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch as the second stage for more definitive treatment of their obesity. However, short-term weight regain may occur owing to gastric dilation after initial laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to prevent gastric dilation after sleeve gastrectomy. We designed a sleeve gastrectomy with wrapping using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh. METHODS: Eleven Yorkshire pigs weighing 20-25 kg underwent sleeve gastrectomy with wrapping using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh (wrapping group) or sleeve gastrectomy only (control group) to compare the weight loss. The animals were weighed weekly postoperatively. Necropsy was performed 8 weeks postoperatively to confirm the wrapping by pathologic report. RESULTS: Four pigs died because of staple line failure or strangulation; no perioperative complications occurred in the other pigs. The operative time for the control group was 198 +/- 60 minutes and for the wrapping group was 181 +/- 86 minutes (P = NS). The average weight of the removed stomach was 123.3 +/- 5.8 g in the control group and 140.3 +/- 69.9 g in the wrapping group (P = NS). The postoperative weight gain at 8 weeks was significantly slower in the wrapping group than in the control group (P <.0001). The pathologic necropsy report noted that the mesh was well attached to the stomach wall at 9 days postoperatively, with no unexpected deaths. CONCLUSION: Sleeve gastrectomy with wrapping using polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh is feasible, and weight gain was reduced in the porcine model.
Authors: Gianmattia del Genio; Michel Gagner; David Nocca; Federico Cuenca-Abente; Laurent Biertho; Anne Waage; Barbara Faife; Federica del Genio; Camilo Boza; Rajesh Aggarwal; Alberto Del Genio Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Víctor Valentí; Marina Martín; Beatriz Ramírez; Javier Gómez-Ambrosi; Amaia Rodríguez; Victoria Catalán; Sara Becerril; Andoni Lancha; Secundino Fernández; Javier A Cienfuegos; María A Burrell; Gema Frühbeck Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Rudolf A Weiner; Sylvia Weiner; Ingmar Pomhoff; Christoph Jacobi; Wojciech Makarewicz; Gerhard Weigand Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: D Nocca; D Krawczykowsky; B Bomans; P Noël; M C Picot; P M Blanc; C de Seguin de Hons; B Millat; M Gagner; L Monnier; J M Fabre Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.129