Jared P Wagner1, Catherine M Curtin, David R Gater, Kevin C Chung. 1. University of Michigan School of Medicine, the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and the Veterans Hospital, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0340, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In the United States, more than 100,000 Americans live with the disability of tetraplegia. These individuals must struggle through long and complicated rehabilitations. Upper-extremity reconstructive surgery can improve use of the upper limb for appropriate candidates; however, a prior national study showed that these procedures rarely are performed. This cross-sectional survey identified the attitudes and beliefs of people with tetraplegia that may dissuade potential candidates from receiving these procedures. METHODS: An oral survey was designed to determine priorities of reconstruction in individuals with tetraplegia. This survey was administered to 50 people with tetraplegia. RESULTS: Among those surveyed, 13 (26%) had never heard of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery, but 22 (44%) were interested in upper-extremity reconstruction. People with tetraplegia who had a negative first impression of these procedures were far less likely to want reconstruction 0 (0%) vs. 11 (45%). Of patients who learned about these procedures from their physicians, 10 (67%) had a negative first impression after the physician consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Although many people with tetraplegia understand the benefits of upper-extremity reconstruction, a large number of them are unaware of or have unfavorable attitudes toward these procedures. These negative attitudes may account for the marked underuse of upper-extremity reconstructive procedures in the United States.
PURPOSE: In the United States, more than 100,000 Americans live with the disability of tetraplegia. These individuals must struggle through long and complicated rehabilitations. Upper-extremity reconstructive surgery can improve use of the upper limb for appropriate candidates; however, a prior national study showed that these procedures rarely are performed. This cross-sectional survey identified the attitudes and beliefs of people with tetraplegia that may dissuade potential candidates from receiving these procedures. METHODS: An oral survey was designed to determine priorities of reconstruction in individuals with tetraplegia. This survey was administered to 50 people with tetraplegia. RESULTS: Among those surveyed, 13 (26%) had never heard of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery, but 22 (44%) were interested in upper-extremity reconstruction. People with tetraplegia who had a negative first impression of these procedures were far less likely to want reconstruction 0 (0%) vs. 11 (45%). Of patients who learned about these procedures from their physicians, 10 (67%) had a negative first impression after the physician consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Although many people with tetraplegia understand the benefits of upper-extremity reconstruction, a large number of them are unaware of or have unfavorable attitudes toward these procedures. These negative attitudes may account for the marked underuse of upper-extremity reconstructive procedures in the United States.
Authors: P Bragge; L Piccenna; J W Middleton; S Williams; G Creasey; S Dunlop; D Brown; R L Gruen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Ida K Fox; Kristen M Davidge; Christine B Novak; Gwendolyn Hoben; Lorna C Kahn; Neringa Juknis; Rimma Ruvinskaya; Susan E Mackinnon Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2015-03
Authors: Lana Kang; Sohaib Z Hashmi; Joseph Nguyen; Steve K Lee; Andrew J Weiland; Carol A Mancuso Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 4.176