Literature DB >> 17397057

Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations.

Stephan Lorenzen1, Yang Zhang.   

Abstract

Most state-of-the-art protein-protein docking algorithms use the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technique to sample the six-dimensional translational and rotational space. Scoring functions including shape complementarity, electrostatics, and desolvation are usually exploited in ranking the docking conformations. While these rigid-body docking methods provide good performance in bound docking, using unbound structures as input frequently leads to a high number of false positive hits. For the purpose of better selecting correct docking conformations, we structurally cluster the docking decoys generated by four widely-used FFT-based protein-protein docking methods. In all cases, the selection based on cluster size outperforms the ranking based on the inherent scoring function. If we cluster decoys from different servers together, only marginal improvement is obtained in comparison with clustering decoys from the best individual server. A collection of multiple decoy sets of comparable quality will be the key to improve the clustering result from meta-docking servers. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397057     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  28 in total

1.  How good is automated protein docking?

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Dmitri Beglov; Tanggis Bohnuud; Scott E Mottarella; Bing Xia; David R Hall; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

2.  Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization.

Authors:  Stephan Lorenzen; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Computational protein design and large-scale assessment by I-TASSER structure assembly simulations.

Authors:  Andrea Bazzoli; Andrea G B Tettamanzi; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A computerized protein-protein interaction modeling study of ampicillin antibody specificity in relation to biosensor development.

Authors:  Minghua Wang; Jianping Wang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  On the analysis of protein-protein interactions via knowledge-based potentials for the prediction of protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Elisenda Feliu; Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  The ClusPro web server for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Bing Xia; Kathryn A Porter; Dzmitry Padhorny; Christine Yueh; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Pre-equilibrium competitive library screening for tuning inhibitor association rate and specificity toward serine proteases.

Authors:  Itay Cohen; Si Naftaly; Efrat Ben-Zeev; Alexandra Hockla; Evette S Radisky; Niv Papo
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination.

Authors:  Srayanta Mukherjee; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance.

Authors:  Brian Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.