Literature DB >> 17395481

Comparison of gestational age classifications: date of last menstrual period vs. clinical estimate.

Martha S Wingate1, Greg R Alexander, Pierre Buekens, Anjel Vahratian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare the two different measures of gestational age currently used on birth certificates (the duration of pregnancy based on the date of last menstrual period [LMP] and the clinical estimate [CE] as related to health status indicators. We contrasted these measures by race/ethnicity.
METHODS: NCHS natality files for 2000-2002 were used, selecting cases of single live birth to U.S. resident mothers with both LMP and CE gestational age information.
RESULTS: Approximately 75% of the records had valid LMP and CE values and for approximately one-half of these, the LMP and CE values did not exactly agree. Overall and for each race and ethnic group, the LMP measures resulted in higher proportions of very preterm, preterm, postterm and SGA births. CE value provided preterm rates of 7.9% and for LMP, 9.9%. The odds ratio of preterm birth for African-Americans using the CE measure was 1.78 [95% Cl 1.77-1.79]. The odds ratio using LMP was 1.93 [95% Cl 1.92-1.94]. Whites were the referent population.
CONCLUSIONS: Different measures of gestational age result in different overall and race-specific rates of very preterm, preterm, postterm, and SGA births. These findings indicate that substituting or combining these measures may have consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17395481     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  36 in total

1.  Perinatal outcomes for Asian, Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander mothers of single and multiple race/ethnicity: California and Hawaii, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Ashley H Schempf; Pauline Mendola; Brady E Hamilton; Donald K Hayes; Diane M Makuc
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Comparison of two measures of gestational age among low income births. The potential impact on health studies, New York, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria Lazariu; Christopher F Davis; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

3.  Healthy start program and feto-infant morbidity outcomes: evaluation of program effectiveness.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Alfred K Mbah; Delores Jeffers; Amina P Alio; Lo Berry
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-08-09

4.  Racial and ethnic variations in temporal changes in fetal deaths and first day infant deaths.

Authors:  Martha S Wingate; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-11

5.  Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Alonzo T Folger; Elizabeth A Kelly; Beena Devi Kamath-Rayne
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

6.  Rising disparities in severe adverse birth outcomes among Haitians in Québec, Canada, 1981-2006.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Martine Chery; Mark Daniel
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-04

7.  The human sex ratio from conception to birth.

Authors:  Steven Hecht Orzack; J William Stubblefield; Viatcheslav R Akmaev; Pere Colls; Santiago Munné; Thomas Scholl; David Steinsaltz; James E Zuckerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Length of prenatal participation in WIC and risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant: Florida, 1996-2004.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Steven B Morse; Jeffrey Roth
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-07-26

9.  Perinatal outcomes among foreign-born and US-born Chinese Americans, 1995-2000.

Authors:  Qing Li; Louis G Keith; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-09-30

10.  Determining gestational age in a low-resource setting: validity of last menstrual period.

Authors:  Rebecca E Rosenberg; A S M Nawshad U Ahmed; Saifuddin Ahmed; Samir K Saha; M A K Azad Chowdhury; Robert E Black; Mathuram Santosham; Gary L Darmstadt
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.