Narges K Tafreshi1, Mark C Lloyd2, Joshua B Proemsey2, Marilyn M Bui2,3,4, Jongphil Kim5, Robert J Gillies1, David L Morse6. 1. Department of Cancer Imaging & Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 2. Analytic Microscopy Core Facility, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 3. Breast Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 4. Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 5. Department of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 6. Department of Cancer Imaging & Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. david.morse@moffitt.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hypoxia is commonly observed in regions of primary tumors and metastases, and is associated with resistance to treatment, more aggressive tumor phenotypes and poor prognosis. Reliable and validated imaging biomarkers of hypoxia are needed for pre-clinical studies and clinical use. Expression of cell-surface carbonic anhydrases IX and XII (CAIX and CAXII) in tumor cells has been associated with tumor hypoxia. CAIX and CAXII specific antibodies conjugated to fluorescent dye were evaluated for the non-invasive detection of hypoxia in vivo. PROCEDURES: Human breast cancer cell lines (MCF10A, DCIS, MCF7, ZR-75.1 and MDA-mb231) were characterized for CAIX and CAXII expression by real-time RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry (ICC) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CAIX, CAXII and the commercially available exogenous hypoxia marker, pimonidazole, was performed using sections of ZR-75.1 and MDA-mb-231 orthotopic breast cancer xenograft tumors from nude mice. In vivo fluorescence imaging of ZR-75.1 tumors in animals housed at varied levels of oxygen was used to quantify the relative uptake of the CAIX and CAXII agents and a commercially available sulfonamide-based agent. Corresponding tumor sections were IHC stained for CAIX, CAXII and pimonidazole. RESULTS: CAIX mRNA expression was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in hypoxia for all cell lines, which was in agreement with protein expression by ICC. CAXII expression was mixed, with a modest hypoxia-related increase in two cell lines (p < 0.05) and no change in others. Quantified IHC staining of ZR-75.1 and MDA-mb-231 tumor sections showed that CAIX and CAXII expression was elevated in regions with pimonidazole staining, but CAXII levels were lower than CAIX. Tumor uptake of the CAIX targeted agent, and IHC staining of CAIX and pimonidazole in corresponding tumor sections were correlated, and co-registered, and shown to be significantly elevated by level of oxygenation (p < 0.001): hypoxia > normoxia > hyperoxia. However, the CAXII and sulfonamide agents were not significantly correlated with hypoxia. CONCLUSION: These studies suggest that the fluorescently labeled CAIX-specific agent is a more robust indicator of hypoxia in vivo compared to the CAXII-specific agent or the agent specific to the CA active site.
PURPOSE:Hypoxia is commonly observed in regions of primary tumors and metastases, and is associated with resistance to treatment, more aggressive tumor phenotypes and poor prognosis. Reliable and validated imaging biomarkers of hypoxia are needed for pre-clinical studies and clinical use. Expression of cell-surface carbonic anhydrases IX and XII (CAIX and CAXII) in tumor cells has been associated with tumor hypoxia. CAIX and CAXII specific antibodies conjugated to fluorescent dye were evaluated for the non-invasive detection of hypoxia in vivo. PROCEDURES: Humanbreast cancer cell lines (MCF10A, DCIS, MCF7, ZR-75.1 and MDA-mb231) were characterized for CAIX and CAXII expression by real-time RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry (ICC) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CAIX, CAXII and the commercially available exogenous hypoxia marker, pimonidazole, was performed using sections of ZR-75.1 and MDA-mb-231 orthotopic breast cancer xenograft tumors from nude mice. In vivo fluorescence imaging of ZR-75.1 tumors in animals housed at varied levels of oxygen was used to quantify the relative uptake of the CAIX and CAXII agents and a commercially available sulfonamide-based agent. Corresponding tumor sections were IHC stained for CAIX, CAXII and pimonidazole. RESULTS:CAIX mRNA expression was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in hypoxia for all cell lines, which was in agreement with protein expression by ICC. CAXII expression was mixed, with a modest hypoxia-related increase in two cell lines (p < 0.05) and no change in others. Quantified IHC staining of ZR-75.1 and MDA-mb-231tumor sections showed that CAIX and CAXII expression was elevated in regions with pimonidazole staining, but CAXII levels were lower than CAIX. Tumor uptake of the CAIX targeted agent, and IHC staining of CAIX and pimonidazole in corresponding tumor sections were correlated, and co-registered, and shown to be significantly elevated by level of oxygenation (p < 0.001): hypoxia > normoxia > hyperoxia. However, the CAXII and sulfonamide agents were not significantly correlated with hypoxia. CONCLUSION: These studies suggest that the fluorescently labeled CAIX-specific agent is a more robust indicator of hypoxia in vivo compared to the CAXII-specific agent or the agent specific to the CA active site.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Carbonic anhydrase IX; Carbonic anhydrase XII; Non-invasive imaging of hypoxia; Targeted agents
Authors: R A Gatenby; H B Kessler; J S Rosenblum; L R Coia; P J Moldofsky; W H Hartz; G J Broder Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1988-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Anand T N Kumar; Scott B Raymond; Andrew K Dunn; Brian J Bacskai; David A Boas Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: C C Wykoff; N J Beasley; P H Watson; K J Turner; J Pastorek; A Sibtain; G D Wilson; H Turley; K L Talks; P H Maxwell; C W Pugh; P J Ratcliffe; A L Harris Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J A Raleigh; D P Calkins-Adams; L H Rinker; C A Ballenger; M C Weissler; W C Fowler; D B Novotny; M A Varia Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Johan Bussink; Jasper Lok; Cornelis J A Punt; Arend Heerschap; Albert J van Der Kogel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J H Kaanders; L A Pop; H A Marres; J Liefers; F J van den Hoogen; W A van Daal; A J van der Kogel Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Bruna V Jardim-Perassi; Suning Huang; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Jan Poleszczuk; Mikalai M Budzevich; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Smitha R Pillai; Epifanio Ruiz; Marilyn M Bui; Debora A P C Zuccari; Robert J Gillies; Gary V Martinez Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Zhijuan Chen; Lingbao Ai; Mam Y Mboge; Robert McKenna; Christopher J Frost; Coy D Heldermon; Susan C Frost Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: D L Bailey; B J Pichler; B Gückel; H Barthel; A J Beer; R Botnar; R Gillies; V Goh; M Gotthardt; R J Hicks; R Lanzenberger; C la Fougere; M Lentschig; S G Nekolla; T Niederdraenk; K Nikolaou; J Nuyts; D Olego; K Åhlström Riklund; A Signore; M Schäfers; V Sossi; M Suminski; P Veit-Haibach; L Umutlu; M Wissmeyer; T Beyer Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Simon J A van Kuijk; Ala Yaromina; Ruud Houben; Raymon Niemans; Philippe Lambin; Ludwig J Dubois Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 6.244