Literature DB >> 17393197

Ureteral access sheath insertion forces: implications for design and training.

Renato N Pedro1, Derek Weiland, Scott Reardon, Manoj Monga.   

Abstract

Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) vary in their ability to resist buckling forces. We evaluated the forces utilized during simulated placement of a UAS. A model UAS (21F OD, 9F ID) was made of polyolefin material. Mounted to the distal tip of the catheter was a spring (7/32'' x 1'' x 0.28'' wire thickness). When simulating catheter insertion, the spring was placed in contact with an Extech 475040 Digital Force Gauge to measure the peak compression force (Newton). Three repetitions of the task were performed by practicing urologists (n = 8) and urology residents (n = 5). Participants were instructed to "Push until you feel a level of resistance that would make you stop if you were putting in a real ureteral access sheath". Urologists applied a maximum force of 6.55 +/- 0.45 N while urology residents applied a maximum force of 4.84 +/- 0.64 N. There was a significant difference in the forces applied between the two groups (P = 0.035). No significant difference in the variance (ranges or spread) of forces applied by the urologists and residents were identified (P = 0.11). One-way analysis of variance demonstrated no differences in the force applied between the first, second and third attempt (P = 0.80). Quantifying the insertion forces used during placement of a UAS will facilitate the design of UAS and provides information critical to the design of ureteroscopic simulators. Understanding the range of forces used by experienced urologists will help establish competency parameters for professionals in training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17393197     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-007-0086-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  8 in total

1.  The URO Mentor: development and evaluation of a new computer-based interactive training system for virtual life-like simulation of diagnostic and therapeutic endourological procedures.

Authors:  M S Michel; T Knoll; K U Köhrmann; P Alken
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Jamil Rehman; Manoj Monga; Jaime Landman; David I Lee; Tamer Felfela; Marius C Conradie; Rajamahanty Srinivas; Chandru P Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Systematic evaluation of ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Manoj Monga; Aaron Gawlik; William Durfee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Harrison M Abrahams; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 5.  Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath.

Authors:  Richard Vanlangendonck; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter.

Authors:  H Takayasu; Y Aso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity.

Authors:  Paul K Pietrow; Brian K Auge; Fernando C Delvecchio; Ari D Silverstein; Alon Z Weizer; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy?

Authors:  J Kourambas; R R Byrne; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study.

Authors:  Tomasz Ozimek; Judith R Wiessmeyer; Julian P Struck; Marie C Roesch; Nils Gilbert; Jan M Laturnus; Axel S Merseburger; Mario W Kramer
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 2.  Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Adam G Kaplan; Michael E Lipkin; Charles D Scales; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Histological changes caused by the prolonged placement of ureteral access sheaths: an experimental study in porcine model.

Authors:  Mehmet Özsoy; Iason Kyriazis; Theofanis Vrettos; Dimitrios Kotsiris; Panteleeimon Ntasiotis; Christian Seitz; Liatsikos Evangelos; Kallidonis Panagiotis
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Pharmacological Relaxation of the Ureter When Using Ureteral Access Sheaths during Ureterorenoscopy: A Randomized Feasibility Study in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Søren Kissow Lildal; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Frederikke Eichner Christiansen; Helene Jung; Malene Roland Pedersen; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2016-10-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.