Literature DB >> 15040404

The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths.

Harrison M Abrahams1, Marshall L Stoller.   

Abstract

The current authors' experience with thousands of ureteroscopic procedures has led them to believe that ureteral access sheaths are seldom necessary. No study to date has accurately determined an advantage of using these sheaths for routine ureteroscopy. The current authors have outlined their alternative methods that eliminate the reported advantages of the sheaths. Their philosophy of stone treatment uses laser lithotripsy for small stone burdens and SWL or PNL for larger stone burdens and eliminates the need for prolonged ureteroscopic procedures. Several disadvantages of access sheaths are evident. When this information is taken into account, the routine use of a ureteral access sheath becomes unnecessary. It is only in unusual cases that ureteral access sheaths are of any utility.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15040404     DOI: 10.1016/S0094-0143(03)00085-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  13 in total

1.  Ureteral access sheath insertion forces: implications for design and training.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Derek Weiland; Scott Reardon; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-03-13

Review 2.  Ureteroscopy for treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children: technical considerations.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Joan Ko; Brian R Matlaga; Ming-Hsien Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  The surgical experience influences the safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  F Berardinelli; L Cindolo; P De Francesco; S Proietti; D Hennessey; O Dalpiaz; C M Cracco; F Pellegrini; C M Scoffone; L Schips; G Giusti
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  How effective is ureteroscopy in the treatment of pediatric stone disease?

Authors:  John C Thomas
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-09

Review 5.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Adam G Kaplan; Michael E Lipkin; Charles D Scales; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Gaetan Berquet; Paul Prunel; Grégory Verhoest; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Histological changes caused by the prolonged placement of ureteral access sheaths: an experimental study in porcine model.

Authors:  Mehmet Özsoy; Iason Kyriazis; Theofanis Vrettos; Dimitrios Kotsiris; Panteleeimon Ntasiotis; Christian Seitz; Liatsikos Evangelos; Kallidonis Panagiotis
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The cost analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 302 cases.

Authors:  Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atış; Ozgur Arikan; Ozgur Efilioglu; Asıf Yıldırım; Onur Danacıoglu; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Ureteric Stones - State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Radhika Bhanot; Patrick Jones; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.