Literature DB >> 17391899

The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004.

James T McPhee1, Joshua S Hill, Mohammad H Eslami.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) may decrease a patient's risk of rupture and confers a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate than emergency repair. Previous works have shown that AAA rupture rates are higher in women compared to men, and that women have higher associated in-hospital mortality rates. This study was performed to evaluate, currently, to what extent patient gender influences presentation and treatment of AAA and the associated outcomes in the United States.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used, with pertinent ICD-9 codes, to identify all patient-discharges that occurred with the primary diagnosis of intact (iAAA) or ruptured/dissecting (rAAA) abdominal aortic aneurysms between the years 2001 and 2004. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses of variables were performed.
RESULTS: An estimated 220,403 AAA patient-discharges were identified during the study period. 37,016 (17%) patients presented with rAAA. A higher percentage of women with AAA presented with rupture compared to men (21% vs 16%; odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.54). This rupture rate did not significantly change from 2001 to 2004 (P = .85 for trend). For iAAA, women had higher odds of in-hospital mortality than men (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.24-2.07). Compared to men, in-hospital mortality rates for women with iAAA were higher for both endovascular (2.1% vs 0.83%, P < .0001) and open repairs (6.1% vs 4.0%, P < .0001). For iAAA, fewer women underwent endovascular repair (32.4% vs 46.7%, P < .0001; O.R. 0.59, 95% CI, 0.52-0.67). For patients who presented with rAAA, women were less likely to undergo surgical intervention compared to men (59% vs 70%, P < .0001). For those that underwent repair, women had higher in-hospital mortality rates than men (43% vs 36%, P < .0001; OR 1.49, 95% CI, 1.16-1.91).
CONCLUSION: A higher percentage of women currently present with aneurysm rupture. They have higher in-hospital mortality rates for both iAAA and rAAA. This gender difference in the outcomes following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has persisted over time, the cause of which is not explained by these or previous data, a fact that warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17391899     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  45 in total

Review 1.  Surveillance Imaging Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Harold I Litt
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Current status of the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Linda J Wang; Anand M Prabhakar; Christopher J Kwolek
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 3.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pictorial review of common appearances and complications.

Authors:  Yogesh Kumar; Kusum Hooda; Shuo Li; Pradeep Goyal; Nishant Gupta; Melkamu Adeb
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm does not improve early survival versus open repair in patients younger than 60 years.

Authors:  P K Gupta; B Ramanan; T G Lynch; H Gupta; X Fang; M Balters; J M Johanning; G M Longo; J N MacTaggart; I I Pipinos
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Sex differences in mortality and morbidity following repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Peter A Soden; Sara L Zettervall; Katie E Shean; Thomas C F Bodewes; Alexander B Pothof; Ruby C Lo; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Female sex is associated with comparable 5-year outcomes after contemporary endovascular aneurysm repair despite more challenging anatomy.

Authors:  Thomas F X O'Donnell; Hence J Verhagen; Giovanni Pratesi; Carlo Pratesi; Joep A W Teijink; Frank E G Vermassen; Patrice Mwipatayi; Thomas L Forbes; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Predictive factors for mortality after open repair of paravisceral abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Prateek K Gupta; Jason N Mactaggart; Bala Natarajan; Thomas G Lynch; Shipra Arya; Himani Gupta; Xiang Fang; Iraklis I Pipinos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Washington State abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality shows a steady decline between 1996 and 2016.

Authors:  Matthew A Bartek; Larry G Kessler; Jennifer M Talbott; Jimmy Nguyen; Sherene Shalhub
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm presentation, repair, and mortality in the Vascular Study Group of New England.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Rodney P Bensley; Allen D Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Julie E Adams; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 10.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms in women.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.