Literature DB >> 1739182

Can general surgeons perform colonoscopy safely?

D N Reed1, J D Collins, W J Wyatt, J E Hull, M L Patton, S O Dahm, H H Dabideen, J C Hudson, D B Allen.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to review the safety of colonoscopy performed by nonfellowship-trained general surgeons. To address this issue, we reviewed more than 1,000 consecutive diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies and recorded the complications. This was a multi-institutional study involving seven general surgeons, none of whom had had formal fellowship endoscopic training. Perforation was confirmed by laparotomy, bleeding was defined as that requiring hospitalization and/or transfusion, and cardiopulmonary arrest was self-explanatory. There was one perforation in the diagnostic group and none in the therapeutic group, for a rate of 0.10% overall and 0.12% in diagnostic colonoscopy. There were no instances of bleeding or cardiac arrest. This complication rate of 1 per 1,025 colonoscopic procedures by general surgeons compares favorably with that previously reported by other specialties (p less than 0.001). We conclude that postgraduate endoscopy fellowship is not necessary for general surgeons to become safe colonoscopists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1739182     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90112-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of endoscopic and laparoscopic training practices in surgical residency programs.

Authors:  J M Marks; M S Nussbaum; T A Pritts; D E Scheeres
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded?

Authors:  A Mehran; P Jaffe; J Efron; A Vernava; M A Liberman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Granting of privilege for gastrointestinal endoscopy : This privilege guideline was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Yumi Hori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Perforation of the cecum by a toothpick. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  H Hauser; J Pfeifer; S Uranüs; M Klimpfinger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

5.  A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.

Authors:  S D Wexner; J E Garbus; J J Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Performance measures of surgeon-performed colonoscopy in a Veterans Affairs medical center.

Authors:  H S Tran Cao; B C Cosman; B Devaraj; S Ramamoorthy; T Savides; M L Krinsky; S Horgan; M A Talamini; M K Savu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: a multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Bielawska; Andrew G Day; David A Lieberman; Lawrence C Hookey
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy: a benefit-risk analysis of German surveillance recommendations.

Authors:  F Becker; G Nusko; J Welke; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.